AJPH
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


American Journal of Public Health, Vol. 88, Issue 4 646-648, Copyright © 1998 by American Public Health Association

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow A correction has been published
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Wang, C C
Right arrow Articles by Rong, Z M
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Wang, C C
Right arrow Articles by Rong, Z M
Reducing pregnancy and induced abortion rates in China: family planning with husband participation.

C C Wang, E Vittinghoff, L S Hua, W H Yun and Z M Rong

Department of Health Behavior and Health Education, School of Public Health, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor 48109-2029, USA.

OBJECTIVES: This study assessed the effectiveness of a family planning intervention with and without husband's participation in reducing pregnancy and abortion rates in Shanghai, China. METHODS: In this 3-arm randomized trial among 1800 nonsterilized married women, educational interventions targeting both spouses and targeting the wife only were compared with usual family planning care. RESULTS: Among women not using intrauterine devices (IUDs), the intervention with husband's participation had an effect in reducing pregnancy rates (adjusted odds ratio [OR] = 0.36, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.12, 1.1) and abortion rates (adjusted OR = 0.29, CI = 0.09, 0.94) compared with control subjects, and a significant effect in reducing pregnancy rates (adjusted OR = 0.29, CI = 0.10, 0.85) and abortion rates (adjusted OR = 0.24, CI = 0.07, 0.77) compared with wife-only subjects. CONCLUSIONS: Family planning interventions involving husbands may reduce pregnancy and abortion rates among non-IUD users.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Health Educ ResHome page
B. C. Mullany, S Becker, and M. Hindin
The impact of including husbands in antenatal health education services on maternal health practices in urban Nepal: results from a randomized controlled trial
Health Educ. Res., April 1, 2007; 22(2): 166 - 176.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Health Educ BehavHome page
B. T. T. Ha, R. Jayasuriya, and N. Owen
Predictors of Men's Acceptance of Modern Contraceptive Practice: Study in Rural Vietnam
Health Educ Behav, December 1, 2005; 32(6): 738 - 750.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Health Educ ResHome page
B. T. T. Ha, R. Jayasuriya, and N. Owen
Increasing male involvement in family planning decision making: trial of a social-cognitive intervention in rural Vietnam
Health Educ. Res., October 1, 2005; 20(5): 548 - 556.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Health Educ ResHome page
B. T. T. Ha, R. Jayasuriya, and N. Owen
Male involvement in family planning in rural Vietnam: an application of the Transtheoretical Model
Health Educ. Res., April 1, 2003; 18(2): 171 - 180.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1998 by the American Public Health Association