AJPH
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


American Journal of Public Health, Vol. 88, Issue 4 618-622, Copyright © 1998 by American Public Health Association

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Marang-van de Mheen, P J
Right arrow Articles by Gunning-Schepers, L J
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Marang-van de Mheen, P J
Right arrow Articles by Gunning-Schepers, L J
Variation between studies in reported relative risks associated with hypertension: time trends and other explanatory variables.

P J Marang-van de Mheen and L J Gunning-Schepers

Institute of Social Medicine, Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands. p.j.vandemheen@amc.uva.nl

OBJECTIVES: This study examined the variation in reported relative risks of coronary heart disease and stroke associated with hypertension and determined reasons for the interstudy variation. METHODS: Studies published since 1970 were examined that reported the absolute number of events and person-years for men by age and hypertensive status. The data were pooled in Poisson regression models with the coronary heart disease or stroke rate as the dependent variable. Independent variables were hypertensive status, age at entry, age of study, duration of follow-up, diastolic blood pressure cut-off point, and interactions of all these variables with hypertensive status. RESULTS: The reported relative risks associated with hypertension ranged from 1.45 to 2.77 for coronary heart disease and from 1.86 to 5.78 for stroke. Smaller relative risks were found in more recent studies, in studies with long follow-up, and in studies using a lower cut-off point to define hypertension. CONCLUSIONS: Part of the interstudy variation in relative risks associated with hypertension can be attributed to differences in duration of follow-up, blood pressure cutoff point, and time at which blood pressure was measured, suggesting declining relative risks over time.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Arch Intern MedHome page
S. Seshadri, P. A. Wolf, A. Beiser, R. S. Vasan, P. W. F. Wilson, C. S. Kase, M. Kelly-Hayes, W. B. Kannel, and R. B. D'Agostino
Elevated Midlife Blood Pressure Increases Stroke Risk in Elderly Persons: The Framingham Study
Arch Intern Med, October 22, 2001; 161(19): 2343 - 2350.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
BMJHome page
R. Padwal, S. E Straus, and F. A McAlister
Evidence based management of hypertension: Cardiovascular risk factors and their effects on the decision to treat hypertension: evidence based review
BMJ, April 21, 2001; 322(7292): 977 - 980.
[Full Text]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1998 by the American Public Health Association