HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Full Text (PDF) Submit a response Purchase Article View Shopping Cart Alert me when this article is cited Alert me when eLetters are posted Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Trinkoff, A M Articles by Storr, C L Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Trinkoff, A M Articles by Storr, C L

Substance use among nurses: differences between specialties.

A M Trinkoff and C L Storr

Department of Psychiatric, Community and Adult Primary Care Nursing, University of Maryland School of Nursing, Baltimore, USA. trinkoff@nurse-1.ab.umd.edu

OBJECTIVES: Valid data on factors that increase a health care worker's likelihood of substance use are integral in ensuring professional standards and quality health care for consumers. This study explored the association between nursing specialty and past-year substance use. METHODS: In an anonymous mailed survey, a balanced stratified sample of registered nurses (n = 4438) reported their use of marijuana, cocaine, and prescription-type drugs, as well as cigarette smoking and binge drinking. RESULTS: Prevalence of use of all substances was 32%. Rates varied by specialty, even when sociodemographics were controlled. Compared with nurses in women's health, pediatrics, and general practice, emergency nurses were 3.5 times as likely to use marijuana or cocaine (odds ratio [OR] = 3.5; 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.5, 8.2); oncology and administration nurses were twice as likely to engage in binge drinking; and psychiatric nurses were most likely to smoke (OR = 2.4; 95% CI = 1.6, 3.8). No specialty differences appeared for prescription-type drug use. CONCLUSIONS: Certain nursing specialties were more likely than others to be associated with substance use. The differences were not explained by demographic characteristics. Inasmuch as a comparison of these results for nurses with prior work on physicians found considerable agreement by specialty, preventive initiatives should consider inter-disciplinary approaches to substance use education.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				I. Cormac and L. McNally How to implement a smoke-free policy Advan. Psychiatr. Treat., May 1, 2008; 14(3): 198 - 207. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				D. R. Smith and P. A. Leggat An international review of tobacco smoking research in the nursing profession, 1976-2006 Journal of Research in Nursing, March 1, 2007; 12(2): 165 - 181. [Abstract] [PDF]

				D. C. Siebert and C. F. Siebert The Caregiver Role Identity Scale: A Validation Study Research on Social Work Practice, May 1, 2005; 15(3): 204 - 212. [Abstract] [PDF]

				S. C. Lapham, G. McMillan, and C. Gregory IMPACT OF AN ALCOHOL MISUSE INTERVENTION FOR HEALTH CARE WORKERS -- 2: EMPLOYEE ASSISTANCE PROGRAMME UTILIZATION, ON-THE-JOB INJURIES, JOB LOSS AND HEALTH SERVICES UTILIZATION Alcohol Alcohol., March 1, 2003; 38(2): 183 - 188. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. W. Beckstead Modeling Attitudinal Antecedents of Nurses' Decisions to Report Impaired Colleagues West J Nurs Res, August 1, 2002; 24(5): 537 - 551. [Abstract] [PDF]

				R. E. Malone Nursing, Our Public Deaths, and the Tobacco Industry Am. J. Crit. Care., March 1, 2002; 11(2): 102 - 105. [Full Text] [PDF]