AJPH
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


American Journal of Public Health, Vol. 88, Issue 3 475-477, Copyright © 1998 by American Public Health Association

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Breslow, R A
Right arrow Articles by Weed, D L
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Breslow, R A
Right arrow Articles by Weed, D L
Quality of reviews in epidemiology.

R A Breslow, S A Ross and D L Weed

Cancer Prevention Fellowship Program, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, Md. 20892-7344, USA.

OBJECTIVES: This study examined the quality of recent reviews in epidemiology. METHODS: All 1995 issues of 7 widely read epidemiology journals were searched to identify reviews. RESULTS: Twenty-nine reviews were identified. Methodology was not specified or incomplete for literature searches in 79% of reviews; the same was true for inclusion criteria in 83% and for combining studies in 62%. More than 60% of the reviews were not methodologically systematic. CONCLUSIONS: There is a need to improve the quality of review papers in epidemiology. If systematic methodology were followed more frequently, epidemiologic science and its application could be improved.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Int J EpidemiolHome page
K. Dickersin
Systematic reviews in epidemiology: why are we so far behind?
Int. J. Epidemiol., February 1, 2002; 31(1): 6 - 12.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Int J EpidemiolHome page
M. B Bracken
Commentary: Toward systematic reviews in epidemiology
Int. J. Epidemiol., October 1, 2001; 30(5): 954 - 957.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Epidemiol. Community HealthHome page
D L Weed
Methods in epidemiology and public health: does practice match theory?
J Epidemiol Community Health, February 1, 2001; 55(2): 104 - 110.
[Full Text]


Home page
Int J EpidemiolHome page
D. L Weed
Interpreting epidemiological evidence: how meta-analysis and causal inference methods are related
Int. J. Epidemiol., June 1, 2000; 29(3): 387 - 390.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Clin. Nutr.Home page
N. Potischman and D. L Weed
Causal criteria in nutritional epidemiology
Am. J. Clinical Nutrition, June 1, 1999; 69 (6): 1309S - 1314S.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1998 by the American Public Health Association