AJPH
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


American Journal of Public Health, Vol. 88, Issue 3 458-460, Copyright © 1998 by American Public Health Association

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Goodwin, J S
Right arrow Articles by Nattinger, A B
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Goodwin, J S
Right arrow Articles by Nattinger, A B
Geographic variations in breast cancer mortality: do higher rates imply elevated incidence or poorer survival?

J S Goodwin, J L Freeman, D Freeman and A B Nattinger

Department of Medicine, University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston, USA.

OBJECTIVES: Mortality rates from breast cancer are approximately 25% higher for women in the northeastern United States than for women in the South or West. This study examined the hypothesis that the elevation is due to decreased survival rather than increased incidence. METHODS: Data on breast cancer incidence, treatment, and mortality were reviewed. RESULTS: The elevated mortality in the Northeast is apparent only in older women. For women aged 65 years and older, breast cancer mortality is 26% higher in New England than in the South, while incidence is only 3% higher. Breast cancer mortality for older women by state correlates poorly with incidence (r = 0.28). CONCLUSIONS: Those seeking to explain the excess breast cancer mortality in the Northeast should assess survival and should examine differences in cancer control practices that affect survival.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Gerontol. A Biol. Sci. Med. Sci.Home page
J. S. Goodwin, J. L. Freeman, J. D. Mahnken, D. H. Freeman, and A. B. Nattinger
Geographic Variations in Breast Cancer Survival Among Older Women: Implications for Quality of Breast Cancer Care
J. Gerontol. A Biol. Sci. Med. Sci., June 1, 2002; 57(6): M401 - 406.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
CA Cancer J ClinHome page
M. T. Canto, W. F. Anderson, and O. Brawley
Geographic Variation in Breast Cancer Mortality for White and Black Women: 1986-1995
CA Cancer J Clin, November 1, 2001; 51(6): 367 - 370.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Scand J Public HealthHome page
A. Wigertz and R. Westerling
Measures of prevalence: which healthcare registers are applicable?
Scand J Public Health, January 1, 2001; 29(1): 55 - 62.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
J. Epidemiol. Community HealthHome page
J. Manjer, G. Berglund, L. Bondesson, J. P. Garne, L. Janzon, A. Lindgren, J. Malina, and S. Matson
Intra-urban differences in breast cancer mortality: a study from the city of Malmo in Sweden
J Epidemiol Community Health, April 1, 2000; 54(4): 279 - 285.
[Abstract] [Full Text]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1998 by the American Public Health Association