|
|
||||||||
New York State Department of Health, Albany 12237-0619, USA.
OBJECTIVES: This study sought to determine whether the prevalence of dental fluorosis and dental caries had changed in a fluoridated community and a nonfluoridated community since an earlier study conducted in 1986. METHODS: Dental fluorosis and dental caries data were collected on 7- to 14-year-old lifelong residents (n = 1493) of Newburgh and Kingston, NY. RESULTS: Estimated dental fluorosis prevalence rates were 19.6% in Newburgh and 11.7% in Kingston. The greatest disparity in caries scores was observed between poor and nonpoor children in nonfluoridated Kingston. CONCLUSIONS: The prevalence of dental fluorosis has not declined in Newburgh and Kingston, whereas the prevalence of dental caries has continued to decline.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
J.V. Kumar Is Water Fluoridation Still Necessary? Adv. Dent. Res., July 1, 2008; 20(1): 8 - 12. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J.V. Kumar Is Water Fluoridation Still Necessary? Advances in Dental Research, July 1, 2008; 20(1): 8 - 12. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. ALLEN, C. AGOSTA, and D. ESTAFAN Using microabrasive material to remove fluorosis stains J Am Dent Assoc, March 1, 2004; 135(3): 319 - 323. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
E. D. BELTRAN-AGUILAR, S. O. GRIFFIN, and S. A. LOCKWOOD Prevalence and trends in enamel fluorosis in the United States from the 1930s to the 1980s J Am Dent Assoc, February 1, 2002; 133(2): 157 - 165. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. Kumar, P. Swango, V. Haley, and E. Green Intra-oral Distribution of Dental Fluorosis in Newburgh and Kingston, New York Journal of Dental Research, July 1, 2000; 79(7): 1508 - 1513. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |