|
|
||||||||
Division of Health Behavior Research, Washington University, St. Louis, MO 63108, USA. efisher@im.wustl.edu
OBJECTIVES: This study evaluated a community organization approach that emphasized involvement of audiences in program planning and implementation in promoting nonsmoking among African American residents of low-income neighborhoods. METHODS: The quasi-experimental design involved a 24-month intervention in 3 low-income, predominantly African American neighborhoods in St. Louis. Intervention neighborhoods were compared with comparable, untreated neighborhoods in Kansas City. RESULTS: The program was successful in engaging audience members in its governance and in instigating numerous and diverse neighborhood activities to promote nonsmoking. The prevalence of smoking declined from 34% to 27% in program neighborhoods but only from 34% to 33% in comparison neighborhoods. This difference was apparent within all demographically defined subsamples, indicating that observed changes were consistent and not attributable to confounding by demographic characteristics. CONCLUSIONS: A community organization approach emphasizing local authority for program decisions and involvement of informal networks may have an appreciable impact on smoking among residents of low-income, African American neighborhoods.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
J. H. Williams, W. F. Auslander, M. de Groot, A. D. Robinson, C. Houston, and D. Haire-Joshu Cultural Relevancy of a Diabetes Prevention Nutrition Program for African American Women Health Promot Pract, January 1, 2006; 7(1): 56 - 67. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. A. Dzewaltowski, P. A. Estabrooks, L. M. Klesges, S. Bull, and R. E. Glasgow Behavior change intervention research in community settings: how generalizable are the results? Health Promot. Int., June 1, 2004; 19(2): 235 - 245. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. Peltomaki, M. Johansson, W. Ahrens, M. Sala, C. Wesseling, F. Brenes, C. Font, K. Husman, G. Janer, T. Kallas-Tarpila, et al. Social context for workplace health promotion: feasibility considerations in Costa Rica, Finland, Germany, Spain and Sweden Health Promot. Int., June 1, 2003; 18(2): 115 - 126. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. Merzel and J. D'Afflitti Reconsidering Community-Based Health Promotion: Promise, Performance, and Potential Am J Public Health, April 1, 2003; 93(4): 557 - 574. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. L Mercer, L. W Green, A. C Rosenthal, C. G Husten, L. K. Khan, and W. H Dietz Possible lessons from the tobacco experience for obesity control Am. J. Clinical Nutrition, April 1, 2003; 77(4): 1073S - 1082. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. H. Williams, G. A. Belle, C. Houston, D. Haire-Joshu, and W. F. Auslander Process Evaluation Methods of a Peer-Delivered Health Promotion Program for African American Women Health Promot Pract, April 1, 2001; 2(2): 135 - 142. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
W. Sumner II, M. Dunaway, and D. G. Dillman II Cigarette Continuity Programs and Social Support for Smoking Arch Fam Med, June 1, 1998; 7(3): 264 - 268. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |