AJPH
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


American Journal of Public Health, Vol. 88, Issue 1 61-67, Copyright © 1998 by American Public Health Association

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Hornberger, J
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Hornberger, J
A cost-benefit analysis of a cardiovascular disease prevention trial, using folate supplementation as an example.

J Hornberger

Department of Health Research and Policy, Department of Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine, CA, USA.

OBJECTIVES: This study illustrates a cost-benefit analysis of clinical trial design, using as an example a trial of folate supplementation to prevent cardiovascular disease. METHODS: Bayesian statistical and decision-analytic techniques were used to estimate the cost-benefit and sample size of a placebo-controlled trial of folate targeted to US citizens, aged 35 to 84 years, with elevated serum homocysteine levels. The main end point is event-free survival (i.e., survival without new ischemic heart disease or stroke) at 5 years. RESULTS: Because the screening cost and annual cost and inconvenience of taking folate is small compared with the consequences of stroke, ischemic heart disease, or death, the increase in 5-year event-free survival with folate that should compel the use of folate is just 1.1%. The sample size per group needed to establish this level of folate's medical effectiveness is estimated to be 17310. Such a trial would provide an expected societal cost-benefit savings exceeding $11 billion within 15 years. CONCLUSIONS: This study illustrates how Bayesian methods may help in assessing the societal cost-benefit consequences of proposed disease prevention trials, deciding which trials are worth sponsoring, and designing cost-effective trials.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Med Decis MakingHome page
F. Yokota and K. M. Thompson
Value of Information Literature Analysis: A Review of Applications in Health Risk Management
Med Decis Making, June 1, 2004; 24(3): 287 - 298.
[Abstract] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1998 by the American Public Health Association