AJPH
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


American Journal of Public Health, Vol. 87, Issue 8 1367-1374, Copyright © 1997 by American Public Health Association

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Ellertson, C
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Ellertson, C
Mandatory parental involvement in minors' abortions: effects of the laws in Minnesota, Missouri, and Indiana.

C Ellertson

Population Council, New York, NY 10017, USA.

OBJECTIVES: This study examined the effects of parental involvement laws on the birth rate, in-state abortion rate, odds of interstate travel, and odds of late abortion for minors. METHODS: Poisson and logistic regression models fitted to vital records compared the periods before and after the laws were enforced. RESULTS: In each state, the in-state abortion rate for minors fell (relative to the rate for older women) when parental involvement laws took effect. Data offered no empirical support for the proposition that the laws drive up birth rates for minors. Although data were incomplete, the laws appeared to increase the odds of a minor's traveling out of state for her abortion. If one judges from the available data, minors who traveled out of state may have accounted for the entire observed decline in the in-state abortion rate, at least in Missouri. The laws appeared to delay minors' abortions past the eighth week, but probably not into the second trimester. CONCLUSIONS: Several empirical arguments used against and in support of parental involvement laws do not appear to be substantiated.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Am. J. Public HealthHome page
S. Colman, T. Joyce, and R. Kaestner
Misclassification Bias and the Estimated Effect of Parental Involvement Laws on Adolescents' Reproductive Outcomes
Am J Public Health, October 1, 2008; 98(10): 1881 - 1885.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Scand J Public HealthHome page
J. V. Lazarus, L. Jaruseviciene, and J. Liljestrand
Lithuanian general practitioners' knowledge of confidentiality laws in adolescent sexual and reproductive healthcare: A cross-sectional study
Scand J Public Health, May 1, 2008; 36(3): 303 - 309.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
NEJMHome page
T. Joyce, R. Kaestner, and S. Colman
Changes in Abortions and Births and the Texas Parental Notification Law
N. Engl. J. Med., March 9, 2006; 354(10): 1031 - 1038.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1997 by the American Public Health Association