AJPH
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


American Journal of Public Health, Vol. 87, Issue 8 1280-1288, Copyright © 1997 by American Public Health Association

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Related articles in AJPH
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Hiller, E H
Right arrow Articles by Natowicz, M R
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Hiller, E H
Right arrow Articles by Natowicz, M R
Public participation in medical policy-making and the status of consumer autonomy: the example of newborn-screening programs in the United States.

E H Hiller, G Landenburger and M R Natowicz

Genetic Counseling Program, Brandeis University, Waltham, Mass, USA.

OBJECTIVES: State newborn-screening programs collectively administer the largest genetic-testing initiative in the United States. We sought to assess public involvement in formulating and implementing medical policy in this important area of genetic medicine. METHODS: We surveyed all state newborn-screening programs to ascertain the screening tests performed, the mechanisms and extent of public participation, parental access to information, and policies addressing parental consent or refusal of newborn screening. We also reviewed the laws and regulations of each state pertaining to newborn screening. RESULTS: Only 26 of the 51 state newborn-screening programs reported having advisory committees that include consumer representation. Fifteen states reported having used institutional review boards, another venue for public input. The rights and roles of parents vary markedly among newborn-screening programs in terms of the type and availability of screening information as well as consent-refusal and follow-up policies. CONCLUSIONS: There is clear potential for greater public participation in newborn-screening policy-making. Greater public participation would result in more representative policy-making and could enhance the quality of services provided by newborn-screening programs.


Related articles in AJPH:

Genetic screening and public health.
N A Holtzman
AJPH 1997 87: 1275-1277. [PDF]  



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Policy Politics Nursing PracticeHome page
H. Bishop Hubbard
Policy Issues Related to Expanded Newborn Screening: A Review of Three Genetic/Metabolic Disorders
Policy Politics Nursing Practice, August 1, 2007; 8(3): 201 - 209.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Public HealthHome page
D. B. Bailey Jr, D. Skinner, and S. F. Warren
Newborn Screening for Developmental Disabilities: Reframing Presumptive Benefit
Am J Public Health, November 1, 2005; 95(11): 1889 - 1893.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
PediatricsHome page
K. E. Fant, S. J. Clark, and A. R. Kemper
Completeness and Complexity of Information Available to Parents From Newborn-Screening Programs
Pediatrics, May 1, 2005; 115(5): 1268 - 1272.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Public HealthHome page
S. E. Gollust, K. Apse, B. P. Fuller, P. S. Miller, and B. B. Biesecker
Community Involvement in Developing Policies for Genetic Testing: Assessing the Interests and Experiences of Individuals Affected by Genetic Conditions
Am J Public Health, January 1, 2005; 95(1): 35 - 41.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Med. EthicsHome page
E Campbell and L F Ross
Attitudes of healthcare professionals and parents regarding genetic testing for violent traits in childhood
J. Med. Ethics, December 1, 2004; 30(6): 580 - 586.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Epidemiol. Community HealthHome page
J. L Halliday, V. R Collins, M. A. Aitken, M. P M Richards, and C. A Olsson
Genetics and public health--evolution, or revolution?
J. Epidemiol. Community Health, November 1, 2004; 58(11): 894 - 899.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
PediatricsHome page
Committee on Bioethics
Ethical Issues With Genetic Testing in Pediatrics
Pediatrics, June 1, 2001; 107(6): 1451 - 1455.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
PediatricsHome page
Serving the Family From Birth to the Medical Home. Newborn Screening: A Blueprint for the Future - A Call for a National Agenda on State Newborn Screening Programs
Pediatrics, August 1, 2000; 106(2): 389 - 422.
[Full Text]


Home page
Nurs EthicsHome page
T. Reay
Allocating Scarce Resources in a Publicly Funded Health System: Ethical Considerations of a Canadian Managed Care Proposal
Nursing Ethics, May 1, 1999; 6(3): 240 - 249.
[Abstract] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1997 by the American Public Health Association