|
|
||||||||
Genetic Counseling Program, Brandeis University, Waltham, Mass, USA.
OBJECTIVES: State newborn-screening programs collectively administer the largest genetic-testing initiative in the United States. We sought to assess public involvement in formulating and implementing medical policy in this important area of genetic medicine. METHODS: We surveyed all state newborn-screening programs to ascertain the screening tests performed, the mechanisms and extent of public participation, parental access to information, and policies addressing parental consent or refusal of newborn screening. We also reviewed the laws and regulations of each state pertaining to newborn screening. RESULTS: Only 26 of the 51 state newborn-screening programs reported having advisory committees that include consumer representation. Fifteen states reported having used institutional review boards, another venue for public input. The rights and roles of parents vary markedly among newborn-screening programs in terms of the type and availability of screening information as well as consent-refusal and follow-up policies. CONCLUSIONS: There is clear potential for greater public participation in newborn-screening policy-making. Greater public participation would result in more representative policy-making and could enhance the quality of services provided by newborn-screening programs.
Related articles in AJPH:
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
H. Bishop Hubbard Policy Issues Related to Expanded Newborn Screening: A Review of Three Genetic/Metabolic Disorders Policy Politics Nursing Practice, August 1, 2007; 8(3): 201 - 209. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. B. Bailey Jr, D. Skinner, and S. F. Warren Newborn Screening for Developmental Disabilities: Reframing Presumptive Benefit Am J Public Health, November 1, 2005; 95(11): 1889 - 1893. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. E. Fant, S. J. Clark, and A. R. Kemper Completeness and Complexity of Information Available to Parents From Newborn-Screening Programs Pediatrics, May 1, 2005; 115(5): 1268 - 1272. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. E. Gollust, K. Apse, B. P. Fuller, P. S. Miller, and B. B. Biesecker Community Involvement in Developing Policies for Genetic Testing: Assessing the Interests and Experiences of Individuals Affected by Genetic Conditions Am J Public Health, January 1, 2005; 95(1): 35 - 41. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
E Campbell and L F Ross Attitudes of healthcare professionals and parents regarding genetic testing for violent traits in childhood J. Med. Ethics, December 1, 2004; 30(6): 580 - 586. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. L Halliday, V. R Collins, M. A. Aitken, M. P M Richards, and C. A Olsson Genetics and public health--evolution, or revolution? J. Epidemiol. Community Health, November 1, 2004; 58(11): 894 - 899. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Committee on Bioethics Ethical Issues With Genetic Testing in Pediatrics Pediatrics, June 1, 2001; 107(6): 1451 - 1455. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Serving the Family From Birth to the Medical Home. Newborn Screening: A Blueprint for the Future - A Call for a National Agenda on State Newborn Screening Programs Pediatrics, August 1, 2000; 106(2): 389 - 422. [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
T. Reay Allocating Scarce Resources in a Publicly Funded Health System: Ethical Considerations of a Canadian Managed Care Proposal Nursing Ethics, May 1, 1999; 6(3): 240 - 249. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |