HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Full Text (PDF) Submit a response Purchase Article View Shopping Cart Alert me when this article is cited Alert me when eLetters are posted Alert me if a correction is posted Services Related articles in AJPH Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by LaMontagne, A D Articles by Kelsey, K T Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by LaMontagne, A D Articles by Kelsey, K T

Evaluating OSHA's ethylene oxide standard: employer exposure-monitoring activities in Massachusetts hospitals from 1985 through 1993.

A D LaMontagne and K T Kelsey

New England Research Institutes, Watertown, MA 02172, USA.

OBJECTIVES: This study characterized exposure-monitoring activities and findings under the Occupational Safety and Health Administration's (OSHA's) 1984 ethylene oxide (EtO) standard. METHODS: In-depth mail and telephone surveys were followed by on-site interviews at all EtO-using hospitals in Massachusetts (n = 92, 96% participation rate). RESULTS: By 1993, most hospitals had performed personal exposure monitoring for OSHA's 8-hour action level (95%) and the excursion limit (87%), although most did not meet the 1985 implementation deadline. In 1993, 66% of hospitals reported the installation of EtO alarms to fulfill the standard's "alert" requirement. Alarm installation also lagged behind the 1985 deadline and peaked following a series of EtO citations by OSHA. From 1990 through 1992, 23% of hospitals reported having exceeded the action level once or more; 24% reported having exceeded the excursion limit; and 33% reported that workers were accidentally exposed to EtO in the absence of personal monitoring. CONCLUSIONS: Almost a decade after passage of the EtO standard, exposure-monitoring requirements were widely, but not completely, implemented. Work-shift exposures had markedly decreased since the mid-1980s, but overexposures continued to occur widely. OSHA enforcement appears to have stimulated implementation.

Related articles in AJPH:

Annotation: evaluating OSHA's ethylene oxide standard and evaluating OSHA.

R E Yodaiken
AJPH 1997 87: 1096-1097. [PDF]  

This article has been cited by other articles:

				V. Haufroid, B. Merz, A. Hofmann, A. Tschopp, D. Lison, and P. Hotz Exposure to Ethylene Oxide in Hospitals: Biological Monitoring and Influence of Glutathione S-Transferase and Epoxide Hydrolase Polymorphisms Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev., April 1, 2007; 16(4): 796 - 802. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				A. D. LaMontagne, J. M. Oakes, and R. N. Lopez Turley Long-Term Ethylene Oxide Exposure Trends in US Hospitals: Relationship With OSHA Regulatory and Enforcement Actions Am J Public Health, September 1, 2004; 94(9): 1614 - 1619. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]