AJPH
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


American Journal of Public Health, Vol. 87, Issue 7 1107-1112, Copyright © 1997 by American Public Health Association

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Schauffler, H
Right arrow Articles by Wilkerson, J
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Schauffler, H
Right arrow Articles by Wilkerson, J
National health care reform and the 103rd Congress: the activities and influence of public health advocates.

H Schauffler and J Wilkerson

Joint Program in Public Policy and Public Health, School of Public Health, University of California, Berkeley 94720-7360, USA.

OBJECTIVES: This study examined the activities and influence of public health interest groups and coalitions on the national health care reform debates in the 103rd Congress. METHODS: Congressional staff and representatives of public health interest groups, coalitions, and government health agencies were interviewed. Content analysis of eight leading national health care reform bills was performed. RESULTS: The public health community coalesced around public health in health care reform; nearly all the major interest groups and government health agencies joined two or more public health or prevention coalitions, and half joined three or more. The most effective influence on health care reform legislation was early, sustained personal contact with Congress members and their staffs, accompanied by succinct written materials summarizing key points. Media campaigns and grassroots mobilization were less effective. Seven of the eight leading health care reform bills included one or more of the priorities supported by public health advocates. CONCLUSIONS: The public health community played an important role in increasing awareness and support for public health programs in the health care reform bills of the 103rd Congress.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Journal of Health Politics, Policy and LawHome page
J. D. Wilkerson and D. Carrell
Money, Politics, and Medicine: The American Medical PAC's Strategy of Giving in U.S. House Races
Journal of Health Politics Policy and Law, January 1, 1999; 24(2): 335 - 355.
[Abstract] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1997 by the American Public Health Association