AJPH
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


American Journal of Public Health, Vol. 87, Issue 6 962-967, Copyright © 1997 by American Public Health Association

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Buskens, E
Right arrow Articles by Grobbee, D E
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Buskens, E
Right arrow Articles by Grobbee, D E
Routine prenatal screening for congenital heart disease: what can be expected? A decision-analytic approach.

E Buskens, E W Steyerberg, J Hess, J W Wladimiroff and D E Grobbee

Department of Epidemiology and Biosatatistics, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.

OBJECTIVES: This study assessed the potential impact of fetal ultrasound screening on the number of newborns affected by cardiac anomalies. METHODS: A decision model was developed that included the prevalence and history of congenital heart disease, characteristics of ultrasound, risk of abortion, and attitude toward pregnancy termination. Probabilities were obtained with a literature survey; sensitivity analysis showed their influence on expected outcomes. RESULTS: Presently, screening programs may prevent the birth of approximately 1300 severely affected newborns per million second-trimester pregnancies. However, over 2000 terminations of pregnancy would be required, 750 of which would have ended in intrauterine death or spontaneous abortion. Further, 9900 false-positive screening results would occur, requiring referral. Only the sensitivity of routine screening and attitude toward termination of pregnancy appeared to influence the yield substantially. CONCLUSIONS: The impact of routine screening for congenital heart disease appeared relatively small. Further data may be required to fully assess the utility of prenatal screening.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
PediatricsHome page
B. Khoshnood, C. De Vigan, V. Vodovar, J. Goujard, A. Lhomme, D. Bonnet, and F. Goffinet
Trends in Prenatal Diagnosis, Pregnancy Termination, and Perinatal Mortality of Newborns With Congenital Heart Disease in France, 1983-2000: A Population-Based Evaluation
Pediatrics, January 1, 2005; 115(1): 95 - 101.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CirculationHome page
D. Bonnet, A. Coltri, G. Butera, L. Fermont, J. Le Bidois, J. Kachaner, and D. Sidi
Detection of Transposition of the Great Arteries in Fetuses Reduces Neonatal Morbidity and Mortality
Circulation, February 23, 1999; 99(7): 916 - 918.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1997 by the American Public Health Association