HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Full Text (PDF) Submit a response Purchase Article View Shopping Cart Alert me when this article is cited Alert me when eLetters are posted Alert me if a correction is posted Services Related articles in AJPH Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Trussell, J Articles by Stewart, F Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Trussell, J Articles by Stewart, F

Preventing unintended pregnancy: the cost-effectiveness of three methods of emergency contraception.

J Trussell, J Koenig, C Ellertson and F Stewart

Woodrow Wilson School of Public and International Affairs, Princeton University, NJ 08544-2091, USA.

OBJECTIVES: This study examined the cost-effectiveness of emergency contraceptive pills, minipills, and the copper-T intrauterine device (IUD) as emergency contraception. METHODS: Cost savings were modeled for both (1) a single contraceptive treatment following unprotected intercourse and (2) emergency contraceptive pills provided in advance. RESULTS: In a managed care (public payer) setting, a single treatment of emergency contraception after unprotected intercourse saves $142 ($54) with emergency contraceptive pills and $119 ($29) with minipills. The copper-T IUD is not cost-effective as an emergency contraceptive alone, but savings quickly accrue as use continues. Advance provision of emergency contraceptive pills to women using barrier contraceptives, spermicides, withdrawal, or periodic abstinence saves from $263 to $498 ($99 to $205) annually. CONCLUSIONS: Emergency contraception is cost-effective whether provided when the emergency arises or in advance to be used as needed. Greater use of emergency contraception could reduce the considerable medical and social costs of unintended pregnancies.

Related articles in AJPH:

Emergency contraception--parsimony and prevention in the medicine cabinet.

W Cates, Jr and E G Raymond
AJPH 1997 87: 909-910. [PDF]  

This article has been cited by other articles:

				C. Westhoff Emergency Contraception N. Engl. J. Med., November 6, 2003; 349(19): 1830 - 1835. [Full Text] [PDF]

				A. W Esacove and K. R. Andringa The Process of Preventing Pregnancy: Women's Experiences and Emergency Contraception Use Qual Health Res, November 1, 2002; 12(9): 1235 - 1247. [Abstract] [PDF]

				A. Graham, L. Moore, D. Sharp, and I. Diamond Improving teenagers' knowledge of emergency contraception: cluster randomised controlled trial of a teacher led intervention BMJ, May 18, 2002; 324(7347): 1179 - 1179. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				K. D. Marciante, J. S. Gardner, D. L. Veenstra, and S. D. Sullivan Modeling the Cost and Outcomes of Pharmacist-Prescribed Emergency Contraception Am J Public Health, September 1, 2001; 91(9): 1443 - 1445. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				C. Ford Preventing Teen Pregnancy With Emergency Contraception: An Opportunity We Should Not Be Missing Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med, August 1, 1998; 152(8): 725 - 726. [Full Text] [PDF]

				H. B. Peterson A 40-Year-Old Woman Considering Contraception JAMA, May 27, 1998; 279(20): 1651 - 1658. [Full Text] [PDF]

				D. A. Grimes Emergency Contraception -- Expanding Opportunities for Primary Prevention N. Engl. J. Med., October 9, 1997; 337(15): 1077 - 1079. [Full Text]

				Emergency Contraception Is Cost-Effective Journal Watch Women's Health, August 1, 1997; 1997(801): 16 - 16. [Full Text]