HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Full Text (PDF) Submit a response Purchase Article View Shopping Cart Alert me when this article is cited Alert me when eLetters are posted Alert me if a correction is posted Services Related articles in AJPH Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Seage, G R Articles by Epstein, A M Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Seage, G R, 3rd Articles by Epstein, A M

The Boston AIDS Survival Score (BASS): a multidimensional AIDS severity instrument.

G R Seage, 3rd, C Gatsonis, J S Weissman, J S Haas, P D Cleary, F J Fowler, M P Massagli, V E Stone, D E Craven, H Makadon, J Goldberg, K Coltin, K S Levin and A M Epstein

Institute for Urban Health Policy and Research, Boston Department of Health and Hospitals, Mass., USA.

OBJECTIVES: This study developed a new acquired immunodeficiency syndrome (AIDS) severity system by including diagnostic, physiological, functional, and sociodemographic factors predictive of survival. METHODS: Three-hundred five persons with AIDS in Boston were interviewed; their medical records were reviewed and vital status ascertained. RESULTS: Overall median (+/- SD) survival for the cohort from the first interview until death was 560 +/- 14.4 days. The best model for predicting survival, the Boston AIDS Survival Score, included the Justice score (stage 2 relative hazard [RH] = 1.25, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.80, 1.96; stage 3 RH = 1.76, 95% CI = 1.15, 2.70), a newly developed opportunistic disease score (Boston Opportunistic Disease Survival Score; stage 2 RH = 1.35, 95% CI = 0.90, 2.02; stage 3 RH = 2.10, 95% CI = 1.38, 3.18), and measures of activities of daily living (any intermediate limitations, RH = 1.84, 95% CI = 1.05, 3.21; any basic limitations, RH = 2.60, 95% CI = 1.44, 4.69). This model had substantially greater predictive power (R2 = .17, C statistic = .68) than the Justice score alone (R2 = .09, C statistic = .61). CONCLUSIONS: Incorporating data on clinically important events and functional status into a physiologically based system can improve the prediction of survival with AIDS.

Related articles in AJPH:

Annotation: wanted--a simple and meaningful HIV staging system.

W el-Sadr and J D Neaton
AJPH 1997 87: 546-548. [PDF]  

This article has been cited by other articles:

				G. R. Williams and J. G. Jiang Development of an Ischemic Stroke Survival Score Stroke, October 1, 2000; 31(10): 2414 - 2420. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]