AJPH
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


American Journal of Public Health, Vol. 87, Issue 12 1989-1996, Copyright © 1997 by American Public Health Association

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Macdonald, H
Right arrow Articles by Glantz, S A
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Macdonald, H
Right arrow Articles by Glantz, S A
The defeat of Philip Morris' 'California Uniform Tobacco Control Act'.

H Macdonald, S Aguinaga and S A Glantz

Department of Medicine, University of California, San Francisco 94143-0124, USA.

OBJECTIVES: This paper describes the strategies used by Philip Morris and other tobacco companies to promote a California initiative (Proposition 188) preempting local control of tobacco and those used by public health groups to defeat the initiative. METHODS: Interviews with key informants were conducted, and the written record was reviewed. RESULTS: Tobacco companies nearly succeeded in passing Proposition 188 by presenting it as a pro-health measure that would prevent children from obtaining cigarettes and provide protection against secondhand smoke. Public health groups defeated it by highlighting tobacco industry backing. A private charitable foundation also played an innovative role by financing a non-partisan public education campaign. CONCLUSIONS: Public health forces must be alert to sophisticated efforts by the tobacco industry to enact preemptive state legislation by making it look like tobacco control legislation. The coalition structure that emerged in the "No on 188" campaign represents an effective model for future tobacco control activities. The new role of charitable foundations defined in the Proposition 188 campaign can be used in other public health issues.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev.Home page
E. R. Gritz, L. Sarna, C. Dresler, and C. G. Healton
Building a United Front: Aligning the Agendas for Tobacco Control, Lung Cancer Research, and Policy
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev., May 1, 2007; 16(5): 859 - 863.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Public HealthHome page
W. J. Bartosch and G. C. Pope
Local Enactment of Tobacco Control Policies in Massachusetts
Am J Public Health, June 1, 2002; 92(6): 941 - 943.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Tobacco ControlHome page
C Mekemson and S A Glantz
How the tobacco industry built its relationship with Hollywood
Tob. Control, March 1, 2002; 11(90001): i81 - 91.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Public HealthHome page
J. V. Dearlove and S. A. Glantz
Boards of Health as Venues for Clean Indoor Air Policy Making
Am J Public Health, February 1, 2002; 92(2): 257 - 265.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Tobacco ControlHome page
M. S Givel and S. A Glantz
Tobacco lobby political influence on US state legislatures in the 1990s
Tob. Control, June 1, 2001; 10(2): 124 - 134.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Tobacco ControlHome page
S. Magzamen, A. Charlesworth, and S. A Glantz
Print media coverage of California's smokefree bar law
Tob. Control, June 1, 2001; 10(2): 154 - 160.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of Health Politics, Policy and LawHome page
E. D. Balbach, M. P. Traynor, and S. A. Glantz
The Implementation of California's Tobacco Tax Initiative: The Critical Role of Outsider Strategies in Protecting Proposition 99
Journal of Health Politics Policy and Law, August 1, 2000; 25(4): 689 - 716.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Tobacco ControlHome page
L. K Goldman and S. A Glantz
The passage and initial implementation of Oregon's Measure 44
Tob. Control, September 1, 1999; 8(3): 311 - 322.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
Tobacco ControlHome page
S. A. Bialous and S. A Glantz
Arizona's tobacco control initiative illustrates the need for continuing oversight by tobacco control advocates
Tob. Control, June 1, 1999; 8(2): 141 - 151.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
Tobacco ControlHome page
E. D Balbach and S. A Glantz
Tobacco control advocates must demand high-quality media campaigns: the California experience
Tob. Control, December 1, 1998; 7(4): 397 - 408.
[Abstract] [Full Text]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1997 by the American Public Health Association