|
|
||||||||
UCLA School of Public Health 90095-1772, USA.
Drawing on the case files of a major charitable agency, this paper explores how poor people experienced New York City's pioneering program of tuberculosis control. Although the program provided enormous benefits, poor New Yorkers often had pressing concerns that took priority over eradicating tuberculosis. Moreover, the program imposed extreme hardships even as it promised liberation from a terrible scourge. Poor people did not protest collectively, but many individually resisted. They delayed seeking diagnosis, disobeyed the advice promulgated by the Department of Health, attended clinics irregularly, and either refused to enroll in hospitals, sanatoria, and preventoria or fled soon after arrival.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
A. L. Fairchild and A. Alkon Back to the Future? Diabetes, HIV, and the Boundaries of Public Health Journal of Health Politics Policy and Law, August 1, 2007; 32(4): 561 - 593. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. L. Davidow, B. T. Mangura, E. C. Napolitano, and L. B. Reichman Rethinking the Socioeconomics and Geography of Tuberculosis Among Foreign-Born Residents of New Jersey, 1994-1999 Am J Public Health, June 1, 2003; 93(6): 1007 - 1012. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |