AJPH
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

American Journal of Public Health, Vol. 87, Issue 11 1767-1772, Copyright © 1997 by American Public Health Association

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Related articles in AJPH
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Pernick, M S
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Pernick, M S
Eugenics and public health in American history.

M S Pernick

Department of History, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor 48109-1003, USA. mpernick@umich.edu

Supporters of eugenics, the powerful early 20th-century movement for improving human heredity, often attacked that era's dramatic improvements in public health and medicine for preserving the lives of people they considered hereditarily unfit. Eugenics and public health also battled over whether heredity played a significant role in infectious diseases. However, American public health and eugenics had much in common as well. Eugenic methods often were modeled on the infection control techniques of public health. The goals, values, and concepts of disease of these two movements also often overlapped. This paper sketches some of the key similarities and differences between eugenics and public health in the United States, and it examines how their relationship was shaped by the interaction of science and culture. The results demonstrate that eugenics was not an isolated movement whose significance is confined to the histories of genetics and pseudoscience, but was instead an important and cautionary part of past public health and a general medical history as well.


Related articles in AJPH:

Annotation: racism resurgent--building a bridge to the 19th century.
H J Geiger
AJPH 1997 87: 1765-1766. [PDF]  



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 AffiliaHome page
A. C. Kennedy
Eugenics, "Degenerate Girls," and Social Workers During the Progressive Era
Affilia, February 1, 2008; 23(1): 22 - 37.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 Soc Hist MedHome page
M. Ekberg
The Old Eugenics and the New Genetics Compared
Soc Hist Med, December 1, 2007; 20(3): 581 - 593.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Am. J. Public HealthHome page
A.-E. Birn and N. Molina
In the Name of Public Health
Am J Public Health, July 1, 2005; 95(7): 1095 - 1097.
[Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 J. Epidemiol. Community HealthHome page
J. L Halliday, V. R Collins, M. A. Aitken, M. P M Richards, and C. A Olsson
Genetics and public health--evolution, or revolution?
J. Epidemiol. Community Health, November 1, 2004; 58(11): 894 - 899.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Am. J. Public HealthHome page
M. S. Pernick
PERNICK RESPONDS
Am J Public Health, January 1, 2003; 93(1): 11 - 11.
[Full Text]

Home page
 Am. J. Public HealthHome page
A. M. Stern
Making Better Babies: Public Health and Race Betterment in Indiana, 1920-1935
Am J Public Health, May 1, 2002; 92(5): 742 - 752.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Health Educ BehavHome page
S. M. Modell and T. Citrin
Ethics Instruction in an Issues-Oriented Course on Public Health Genetics
Health Educ Behav, February 1, 2002; 29(1): 43 - 60.
[Abstract] [PDF]


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1997 by the American Public Health Association