|
|
||||||||
University of Kentucky, Lexington 40536-0003, USA.
OBJECTIVES: This study compares prenatal care utilization and birth outcomes between Iowa Medicaid recipients receiving care in a primary care case management (PCCM) system and those receiving care in a fee-for-service (FFS) system. METHODS: Birth certificates linked with Medicaid hospitalization claims were analyzed for seven PCCM and seven FFS counties. RESULTS: From 1989 through 1992, there was (1) a 20% increase in the number of women who received adequate prenatal care in the FFS counties, vs a 5% increase in the PCCM counties; (2) a 17% increase in the number of women who initiated care within the first trimester in the FFS counties, vs a 6% increase in the PCCM counties; and (3) a 442% increase in the number of women who received enhanced prenatal services in the FFS counties, vs a 278% increase in the PCCM counties. There were no significant differences between groups in mean gestational age or birthweight; however, there was an increase of very-low-birthweight babies in both groups. CONCLUSIONS: PCCM, as implemented by the Iowa Medicaid program, has not appreciably improved prenatal care utilization or birth outcomes.
Related articles in AJPH:
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
C. J. Conover, P. J. Rankin, and F. A. Sloan Effects of Tennessee Medicaid Managed Care On Obstetrical Care and Birth Outcomes Journal of Health Politics Policy and Law, December 1, 2001; 26(6): 1291 - 1324. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. M. OLESKE, E. S. LINN, K. L. NACHMAN, R. J. MARDER, J. A. SANGL, and T. SMITH Effect of Medicaid Managed Care on Pregnancy Complications Obstet. Gynecol., January 1, 2000; 95(1): 6 - 13. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. Favaloro A Revival of Paul Dudley White : An Overview of Present Medical Practice and of Our Society Circulation, March 30, 1999; 99(12): 1525 - 1537. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |