AJPH
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


American Journal of Public Health, Vol. 86, Issue 8_Pt_1 1161-1166, Copyright © 1996 by American Public Health Association

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Related articles in AJPH
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Burris, S
Right arrow Articles by Grace, J
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Burris, S
Right arrow Articles by Grace, J
The legal strategies used in operating syringe exchange programs in the United States.

S Burris, D Finucane, H Gallagher and J Grace

Temple Law School, Philadelphia, PA 19122, USA.

OBJECTIVES. This study sought to identify the strategies used by syringe exchange programs to establish their legality. METHODS. Statutes, court decisions, published studies of exchange programs, and news stories were reviewed, and telephone interviews were conducted with syringe exchange personnel. RESULTS. Twenty-seven exchanges have been authorized by amendments to or judicial interpretations of state drug laws or by administrative action under such laws, or operate in a state that has no laws regulating needles. At least 13 programs operate under claims of legality based on local interpretations of state law, principally public health law. The remaining syringe exchanges operate without a claim of legality. CONCLUSIONS. The deployment of syringe exchanges has been hindered by concerns about their legal status. This study shows that the applicability of drug laws to syringe exchange is open to dispute, and that local public health authorities may under some circumstances rely on their own legal authority to fund or operate syringe exchange programs.


Related articles in AJPH:

Needle exchange programs and the law--time for a change.
L H Glantz and W K Mariner
AJPH 1996 86: 1077-1078. [PDF]  



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Am. J. Public HealthHome page
R. N. Bluthenthal, K. G. Heinzerling, R. Anderson, N. M. Flynn, and A. H. Kral
Approval of Syringe Exchange Programs in California: Results From a Local Approach to HIV Prevention
Am J Public Health, February 1, 2008; 98(2): 278 - 283.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Public HealthHome page
L. Beletsky, C. S. Davis, E. Anderson, and S. Burris
The Law (and Politics) of Safe Injection Facilities in the United States
Am J Public Health, February 1, 2008; 98(2): 231 - 237.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1996 by the American Public Health Association