AJPH
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


American Journal of Public Health, Vol. 86, Issue 8_Pt_1 1129-1136, Copyright © 1996 by American Public Health Association

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Related articles in AJPH
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Kegeles, S M
Right arrow Articles by Coates, T J
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Kegeles, S M
Right arrow Articles by Coates, T J
The Mpowerment Project: a community-level HIV prevention intervention for young gay men.

S M Kegeles, R B Hays and T J Coates

Center for AIDS Prevention Studies, University of California, San Francisco 94105, USA.

OBJECTIVES. Since young gay men are engaging in alarmingly high rates of unsafe sex and few seek help for changing risky behaviors, community-level programs to prevent infection with the human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) among them are urgently needed. METHODS. We developed and implemented a community-level HIV prevention program in a midsized Oregon community. The peer-led program had three components: out-reach, small groups, and a publicity campaign. Independently from the prevention program, a cohort of young gay men (n = 300) was surveyed in this and in a similar comparison community pre- and postintervention. RESULTS. Following intervention, the proportion of men engaging in any unprotected anal intercourse decreased from 41.0% to 30.0% (-27% from baseline), decreased from 20.2% to 11.1% (-45% from baseline) with nonprimary partners, and decreased from 58.9% to 44.7% (-24% from baseline) with boyfriends. No significant changes occurred in the comparison community over the same period. CONCLUSIONS. This prevention approach effectively led to HIV risk reduction. To reach risk-taking young gay men, HIV prevention activities must be embedded in social activities and community life.


Related articles in AJPH:

Great expectations, or do we ask too much from community-level interventions?
M Fishbein
AJPH 1996 86: 1075-1076. [PDF]  



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Am. J. Public HealthHome page
K. T. Jones, P. Gray, Y. O. Whiteside, T. Wang, D. Bost, E. Dunbar, E. Foust, and W. D. Johnson
Evaluation of an HIV Prevention Intervention Adapted for Black Men Who Have Sex With Men
Am J Public Health, June 1, 2008; 98(6): 1043 - 1050.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1996 by the American Public Health Association