HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Full Text (PDF) Submit a response Purchase Article View Shopping Cart Alert me when this article is cited Alert me when eLetters are posted Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Rosenblatt, R A Articles by Hart, L G Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Rosenblatt, R A Articles by Hart, L G

The regionalization of perinatal care in Wales and Washington State.

R A Rosenblatt, A Macfarlane, A J Dawson, P H Cartlidge, E H Larson and L G Hart

Department of Family Medicine, Seattle 98195-5304, USA.

OBJECTIVES. The purpose of this study was to compare perinatal regionalization and neonatal mortality in Wales and Washington State. METHODS. The 28 hospitals in Wales and the 80 hospitals in Washington State that offered maternity services and the 218,326 births that occurred in these hospitals in 1989 and 1990 were studied. Surveys were used to identify the neonatal technology and the referral policies of each hospital, and linked data from birth and death certificates were used to examine birthweight-specific neonatal mortality rates for all babies born in these hospitals. RESULTS. Welsh district general hospitals (broadly equivalent to Level II perinatal centers in the United States) have more sophisticated neonatal technology than their Washington State counterparts and appear less likely to refer small or preterm babies to regional or subregional centers. Neonatal mortality rates were quite similar in the two settings. CONCLUSIONS. Perinatal care in Wales appears to be less regionalized than in a similar region in the United States. The relative lack of perinatal regionalization in Wales may contribute to duplication and underutilization of expensive neonatal technologies. National health care systems do not, in and of themselves, lead to optimal regionalization of services.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				P. Van Reempts, L. Gortner, D. Milligan, M. Cuttini, S. Petrou, R. Agostino, D. Field, L. den Ouden, K. Borch, J. Mazela, et al. Characteristics of Neonatal Units That Care for Very Preterm Infants in Europe: Results From the MOSAIC Study Pediatrics, October 1, 2007; 120(4): e815 - e825. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				D. Dobrez, S. Gerber, and P. Budetti Trends in Perinatal Regionalization and the Role of Managed Care. Obstet. Gynecol., October 1, 2006; 108(4): 839 - 845. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				G. Heller, D. K Richardson, R. Schnell, B. Misselwitz, W. Kunzel, and S. Schmidt Are we regionalized enough? Early-neonatal deaths in low-risk births by the size of delivery units in Hesse, Germany 1990-1999 Int. J. Epidemiol., October 1, 2002; 31(5): 1061 - 1068. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				S. E. Gerber, D. G. Dobrez, and P. P. Budetti Managed Care and Perinatal Regionalization in Washington State Obstet. Gynecol., July 1, 2001; 98(1): 139 - 143. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]