AJPH
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


American Journal of Public Health, Vol. 86, Issue 2 257-265, Copyright © 1996 by American Public Health Association

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Lerner, B H
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Lerner, B H
Temporarily detained: tuberculous alcoholics in Seattle, 1949 through 1960.

B H Lerner

Department of Medicine, Columbia University, New York, NY 10032, USA.

Repeatedly noncompliant tuberculosis patients (who are often homeless or substance users) are once again being forcibly detained. Health officials intend that confinement be used only when "less restrictive alternatives" have failed. Past programs of detention can inform current efforts. In 1949, Seattle's Firland Sanatorium established a locked ward. Although initially intended only for active public health threats, the ward was eventually used to maintain order among Firland's alcoholic patients. That is, the staff detained alcoholics--regardless of their infectivity or compliance with medications--for breaking sanatorium rules. In this manner, maintaining institutional order became a legitimate reason for invoking public health powers. Although new detention regulations strive to protect patients' civil liberties, attention must also be paid to the day-to-day implementation of coercive measures. When public health language is used to justify administrative or institutional requirements, disadvantaged patients may be stigmatized.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Br. J. Ophthalmol.Home page
N. Wride, T. Finch, T. Rapley, T. Moreira, C. May, and S. Fraser
What's in a name? Medication terms: what they mean and when to use them
Br. J. Ophthalmol., November 1, 2007; 91(11): 1422 - 1424.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ChestHome page
B. H. Lerner
Catching Patients: Tuberculosis and Detention in the 1990s
Chest, January 1, 1999; 115(1): 236 - 241.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1996 by the American Public Health Association