|
|
||||||||
Research Institute on Addictions, Buffalo, NY 14203, USA.
OBJECTIVES: This study investigated the efficacy of screening for risk drinking during pregnancy with two brief questionnaires, TWEAK and T-ACE. Both include an assessment of tolerance based on the number of drinks women report they can hold. METHODS: Subjects were disadvantaged African-American obstetric patients in Detroit, Mich. Traditional alcoholism screens (Michigan Alcohol Screening Test [MAST], CAGE) and the tolerance question were administered (n = 2717); TWEAK and T-ACE were constructed from tolerance and embedded MAST and CAGE items. In a separate sample (n = 1420), only the T-ACE was administered. Periconceptional risk drinking was the gold standard. Screen evaluations were based on receiver-operating characteristic analyses. RESULTS: At the cutpoint of 2, sensitivity/specificity for embedded screens were 91/77 for TWEAK and 88/79 for T-ACE; comparable values for T-ACE alone were 67/86. TWEAK and T-ACE screened more effectively than CAGE or MAST. CONCLUSIONS: Embedded versions of TWEAK and T-ACE were both highly sensitive to periconceptional risk drinking in this population. Administering T-ACE alone reduced its sensitivity; this suggests that MAST and CAGE administration improves its performance.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
M. J. O'Connor and S. E. Whaley Brief Intervention for Alcohol Use by Pregnant Women Am J Public Health, February 1, 2007; 97(2): 252 - 258. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A.H. Conason, A. Brunstein Klomek, and L. Sher Recognizing alcohol and drug abuse in patients with eating disorders QJM, May 1, 2006; 99(5): 335 - 339. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. D Stark, R. J Pawlosky, S. Beblo, M. Murthy, V. P Flanagan, J. Janisse, M. Buda-Abela, H. Rockett, J. E Whitty, R. J Sokol, et al. Status of plasma folate after folic acid fortification of the food supply in pregnant African American women and the influences of diet, smoking, and alcohol consumption Am. J. Clinical Nutrition, March 1, 2005; 81(3): 669 - 677. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Beblo, K. D. Stark, M. Murthy, J. Janisse, H. Rockett, J. E. Whitty, M. Buda-Abela, S. S. Martier, R. J. Sokol, J. H. Hannigan, et al. Effects of Alcohol Intake During Pregnancy on Docosahexaenoic Acid and Arachidonic Acid in Umbilical Cord Vessels of Black Women Pediatrics, February 1, 2005; 115(2): e194 - e203. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. Derauf, A. R. Katz, and D. Easa Agreement between Maternal Self-reported Ethanol Intake and Tobacco Use During Pregnancy and Meconium Assays for Fatty Acid Ethyl Esters and Cotinine Am. J. Epidemiol., October 1, 2003; 158(7): 705 - 709. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. Merlob, H. Sharan, S. Weiss, S. W. Jacobson, R. J. Sokol, and J. L. Jacobson Maternal Report of Prenatal Alcohol Use Pediatrics, February 1, 2003; 111(2): 443 - 444. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. S. Sommers, C. Savage, J. Wray, and J. M. Dyehouse Laboratory Measures of Alcohol (Ethanol) Consumption: Strategies to Assess Drinking Patterns with Biochemical Measures Biol Res Nurs, January 1, 2003; 4(3): 203 - 217. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. A. Bradley, J. Boyd-Wickizer, S. H. Powell, and M. L. Burman Alcohol Screening Questionnaires in Women: A Critical Review JAMA, July 8, 1998; 280(2): 166 - 171. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Comparing Screens for Drinking in Pregnancy Journal Watch Women's Health, December 1, 1996; 1996(1201): 1 - 1. [Full Text] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |