AJPH
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


American Journal of Public Health, Vol. 85, Issue 6 856-866, Copyright © 1995 by American Public Health Association

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Hamlin, C
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Hamlin, C
Could you starve to death in England in 1839? The Chadwick-Farr controversy and the loss of the "social" in public health.

C Hamlin

Department of History, University of Notre Dame, IN 46556, USA.

The public health field has long been pulled in two directions, either toward a narrower biomedical mission to control infectious disease or toward a broader mission to address the social and economic factors that adversely affect health and wellbeing. This paper explores as an instance of this tension an 1839 controversy between the statistician William Farr and the pioneering sanitary reformer Edwin Chadwick on the role of starvation as a cause of death. Farr thought hunger contribution significantly to many deaths; Chadwick wanted Farr to concentrate on the diseases from which people actually died. The paper then considers what the "constitutional" disease theories, which underlay Farr's concerns, implied for public health using medical testimony on child labor in industrial revolution factories as an illustration. An exploration of this constitutional medicine may help provide a "useable past" for modern public health workers interested in broadening the scope of public health.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
JRSMHome page
P. Clayton and J. Rowbotham
An unsuitable and degraded diet? Part one: public health lessons from the mid-Victorian working class diet
J R Soc Med, June 1, 2008; 101(6): 282 - 289.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Social Science HistoryHome page
D. L. Anderton and S. H. Leonard
Grammars of Death: An Analysis of Nineteenth-Century Literal Causes of Death from the Age of Miasmas to Germ Theory
Social Science History, March 1, 2004; 28(1): 111 - 143.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Int J EpidemiolHome page
N. Paneth
Commentary: Snow on rickets
Int. J. Epidemiol., June 1, 2003; 32(3): 341 - 343.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
BMJHome page
C. Hamlin and S. Sheard
Revolutions in public health: 1848, and 1998?
BMJ, August 29, 1998; 317(7158): 587 - 591.
[Full Text]


Home page
BMJHome page
I. Sram and J. Ashton
Millennium report to Sir Edwin Chadwick
BMJ, August 29, 1998; 317(7158): 592 - 596.
[Full Text]


Home page
Health Educ BehavHome page
N. Freudenberg
Community-Based Health Education for Urban Populations: An Overview
Health Educ Behav, February 1, 1998; 25(1): 11 - 23.



Home page
Journal of Health Politics, Policy and LawHome page
C. Hamlin
Finding a Function for Public Health: Disease Theory or Political Philosophy?
Journal of Health Politics Policy and Law, December 1, 1995; 20(4): 1025 - 1031.
[PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1995 by the American Public Health Association