AJPH
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


American Journal of Public Health, Vol. 85, Issue 6 791-794, Copyright © 1995 by American Public Health Association

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Related articles in AJPH
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Janerich, D T
Right arrow Articles by Polednak, A P
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Janerich, D T
Right arrow Articles by Polednak, A P
The screening histories of women with invasive cervical cancer, Connecticut.

D T Janerich, O Hadjimichael, P E Schwartz, D M Lowell, J W Meigs, M J Merino, J T Flannery and A P Polednak

Department of Medicine, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City 84132, USA.

OBJECTIVES. Each case of a continuous series of invasive cervical cancer cases was studied with a structured review procedure conducted by an expert panel to assess the reason that it was not detected before it became invasive. METHODS. All cases of invasive cervical cancer diagnosed in a 5-year period among Connecticut residents were identified; a screening history and screening outcome were obtained for 72% (481 of 664). RESULTS. Two hundred fifty women (51.9%) had suboptimal screening. One hundred thirty-seven women (28.5%) had never had a screening test, and their mean age was greater than that of the rest of the study population (64.5 years vs 46.5 years). Of the 344 women who had ever had a Pap test, 113 (32.8%) had their last Pap test 5 or more years before their diagnosis of invasive cancer; 52 (15.1%) were not followed up properly; 33 (9.6%) had their last smear misread as normal; and 118 (34.3%) developed cervical cancer within 3 years of their last Pap test. CONCLUSIONS. Physicians, nurses, and other care providers need to ensure that woman have timely and accurate screening with proper follow-up, make increased efforts to reach older women, and improve quality control of Pap smear readings.


Related articles in AJPH:

Surveillance for pesticide-related illness--lessons from California.
D C Ordin and L J Fine
AJPH 1995 85: 762-763. [PDF]  



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Obstet GynecolHome page
K. S. Eggleston, A. L. Coker, K. J. Luchok, and T. E. Meyer
Adherence to Recommendations for Follow-up to Abnormal Pap Tests
Obstet. Gynecol., June 1, 2007; 109(6): 1332 - 1341.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
BMJHome page
A. Herbert and J. H F Smith
Women under 25 should be offered screening
BMJ, February 10, 2007; 334(7588): 273 - 273.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JNCI J Natl Cancer InstHome page
W. A. Leyden, M. M. Manos, A. M. Geiger, S. Weinmann, J. Mouchawar, K. Bischoff, M. U. Yood, J. Gilbert, and S. H. Taplin
Cervical Cancer in Women With Comprehensive Health Care Access: Attributable Factors in the Screening Process
J Natl Cancer Inst, May 4, 2005; 97(9): 675 - 683.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Obstet GynecolHome page
C. R. Breitkopf, J. Catero, J. Jaccard, and A. B. Berenson
Psychological and Sociocultural Perspectives on Follow-up of Abnormal Papanicolaou Results
Obstet. Gynecol., December 1, 2004; 104(6): 1347 - 1354.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Obstet GynecolHome page
K. Behbakht, A. Lynch, S. Teal, K. Degeest, and S. Massad
Social and Cultural Barriers to Papanicolaou Test Screening in an Urban Population
Obstet. Gynecol., December 1, 2004; 104(6): 1355 - 1361.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Br. J. Radiol.Home page
M Garipagaoglu, F Kayikcioglu, M F Kose, M Adli, K H Gulkesen, Z Kocak, and G Tulunay
Adding concurrent low dose continuous infusion of cisplatin to radiotherapy in locally advanced cervical carcinoma: a prospective randomized pilot study
Br. J. Radiol., July 1, 2004; 77(919): 581 - 587.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Obstet GynecolHome page
C. L. Trimble, L. A. Richards, B. Wilgus-Wegweiser, K. Plowden, D. L. Rosenthal, and A. Klassen
Effectiveness of Screening for Cervical Cancer in an Inpatient Hospital Setting
Obstet. Gynecol., February 1, 2004; 103(2): 310 - 316.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
NEJMHome page
P. W. Rufleth, G. F. Sawaya, S. Kulasingam, and H. Lawson
Extending the Interval between Cervical-Cancer Screenings
N. Engl. J. Med., January 22, 2004; 350(4): 414 - 415.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
NEJMHome page
G. F. Sawaya, K. J. McConnell, S. L. Kulasingam, H. W. Lawson, K. Kerlikowske, J. Melnikow, N. C. Lee, G. Gildengorin, E. R. Myers, and A. E. Washington
Risk of Cervical Cancer Associated with Extending the Interval between Cervical-Cancer Screenings
N. Engl. J. Med., October 16, 2003; 349(16): 1501 - 1509.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Obstet GynecolHome page
A.-M. E. Amies, L. Miller, S.-K. Lee, and L. Koutsky
The Effect of Vaginal Speculum Lubrication on the Rate of Unsatisfactory Cervical Cytology Diagnosis
Obstet. Gynecol., November 1, 2002; 100(5): 889 - 892.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev.Home page
A. R. Giuliano, M. Papenfuss, M. Abrahamsen, C. Denman, J. G. de Zapien, J. L. N. Henze, L. Ortega, E. M. B. de Galaz, J. Stephan, J. Feng, et al.
Human Papillomavirus Infection at the United States-Mexico Border: Implications for Cervical Cancer Prevention and Control
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev., November 1, 2001; 10(11): 1129 - 1136.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
NEJMHome page
G. F. Sawaya, A. D. Brown, A. E. Washington, and A. M. Garber
Current Approaches to Cervical-Cancer Screening
N. Engl. J. Med., May 24, 2001; 344(21): 1603 - 1607.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JAMAHome page
T. C. Wright Jr, L. Denny, L. Kuhn, A. Pollack, and A. Lorincz
HPV DNA Testing of Self-collected Vaginal Samples Compared With Cytologic Screening to Detect Cervical Cancer
JAMA, January 5, 2000; 283(1): 81 - 86.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev.Home page
R. A. Hiatt and B. K. Rimer
A New Strategy for Cancer Control Research
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev., November 1, 1999; 8(11): 957 - 964.
[Full Text]


Home page
Obstet GynecolHome page
G. F. Sawaya and D. A. Grimes
NEW TECHNOLOGIES IN CERVICAL CYTOLOGY SCREENING: A WORD OF CAUTION
Obstet. Gynecol., August 1, 1999; 94(2): 307 - 310.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
NEJMHome page
P. G. Rose, B. N. Bundy, E. B. Watkins, J. T. Thigpen, G. Deppe, M. A. Maiman, D. L. Clarke-Pearson, and S. Insalaco
Concurrent Cisplatin-Based Radiotherapy and Chemotherapy for Locally Advanced Cervical Cancer
N. Engl. J. Med., April 15, 1999; 340(15): 1144 - 1153.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JAMAHome page
M. D. Greenberg, L. G. Koss, L. J. Mango, P. W. Radensky, C. B. Schechter, T. J. O'Leary, S.-B. Buckner, C. W. Ollayos, and A. M. Garber
Rescreening of Cervical Papanicolaou Smears Using PAPNET
JAMA, June 10, 1998; 279(22): 1785 - 1788.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Obstet GynecolHome page
V. B. Benard, C. R. Eheman, H. W. Lawson, D. K. Blackman, C. Anderson, W. Helsel, S. F. Thames, and N. C. Lee
Cervical Screening in the National Breast and Cervical Cancer Early Detection Program, 1995-2001
Obstet. Gynecol., January 1, 1992; 103(3): 564 - 571.
[Abstract] [Full Text]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1995 by the American Public Health Association