AJPH
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


American Journal of Public Health, Vol. 85, Issue 6 765-770, Copyright © 1995 by American Public Health Association

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Livingood, W C
Right arrow Articles by Godin, S W
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Livingood, W C, Jr
Right arrow Articles by Godin, S W
The feasibility and desirability of public health credentialing: a survey of public health leaders.

W C Livingood, Jr, L D Woodhouse and S W Godin

Health Department, East Stroudsburg University, PA 18301, USA.

OBJECTIVES. The goal of this study was to provide insight concerning the potential of credentialing public health workers through an exploratory examination of public health leaders' perceptions. METHODS. Qualitative and quantitative procedures were used. Credentialing issues were identified through the literature and through open-ended interviews with leaders and experts. A 74-item Likert-type survey was used to quantify perceptions. Key informants and survey participants were identified through pertinent organizations. RESULTS. The public health leaders leaned toward consensus on some benefits of and concerns about credentialing. There was no consensus related to a specific form of desired credentialing, although national certification was supported by a plurality. State licensing and an emphasis on the master's in public health (MPH) degree were opposed by large margins. Public health leadership survey results were similar to results of a survey of credentialing experts. CONCLUSIONS. The lack of consensus and the vehemence of some opposing positions indicate that movements toward credentialing should proceed cautiously. However, many of the response patterns indicate that the issue merits further exploration.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Health Promot PractHome page
L. D. Woodhouse, M. E. Auld, W. C. Livingood, and L. A. Mulligan
Survey of Accredited Master of Public Health (MPH) Programs With Health Education Concentrations: A Resource for Strengthening the Public Health Workforce
Health Promot Pract, April 1, 2006; 7(2): 258 - 265.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Health Promot PractHome page
L. L. Lindley, R. W. Wilson, and J. D. Dunn
Assessment of the Training Needs of Kentucky Public Health Educators
Health Promot Pract, January 1, 2005; 6(1): 97 - 104.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Health Educ BehavHome page
W. C. Livingood
Becoming a Health Education Profession: Key to Societal Influence 1995 SOPHE Presidential Address
Health Educ Behav, November 1, 1996; 23(4): 421 - 430.
[PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1995 by the American Public Health Association