|
|
||||||||
Department of Medicine, University of California, Davis, School of Medicine, Sacramento, USA.
OBJECTIVES. The purpose of this study was to compare the economic costs and benefits of fortifying grain with folic acid to prevent neural tube defects. METHODS. A cost-benefit analysis based on the US population, using the human capital approach to estimate the costs associated with preventable neural tube defects, was conducted. RESULTS. Under a range of assumptions about discount rates, baseline folate intake, the effectiveness of folate in preventing neural tube defects, the threshold dose that minimizes risk, and the cost of surveillance, fortification would likely yield a net economic benefit. The best estimate of this benefit is $94 million with low-level (140 micrograms [mcg] per 100 g grain) fortification and $252 million with high-level (350 mcg/100 g) fortification. The benefit-to-cost ratio is estimated at 4.3:1 for low-level and 6.1:1 for high-level fortification. CONCLUSIONS. By averting costly birth defects, folic acid fortification of grain in the United States may yield a substantial economic benefit. We may have underestimated net benefits because of unmeasured costs of neural tube defects and unmeasured benefits of higher folate intake. We may have overestimated net benefits if the cost of neurologic sequelae related to delayed diagnosis of vitamin B12 deficiency exceeds our projection.
Related articles in AJPH:
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
J. Jentink, N. W. van de Vrie-Hoekstra, L. T. W. de Jong-van den Berg, and M. J. Postma Economic evaluation of folic acid food fortification in The Netherlands Eur J Public Health, June 1, 2008; 18(3): 270 - 274. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. G.K. Bentley, W. C. Willett, M. C. Weinstein, and K. M. Kuntz Population-Level Changes in Folate Intake by Age, Gender, and Race/Ethnicity after Folic Acid Fortification Am J Public Health, November 1, 2006; 96(11): 2040 - 2047. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. M. Robbins, J. M. Tilford, T.M. Bird, M. A. Cleves, J. A. Reading, and C. A. Hobbs Hospitalizations of Newborns With Folate-Sensitive Birth Defects Before and After Fortification of Foods With Folic Acid Pediatrics, September 1, 2006; 118(3): 906 - 915. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. D. Grosse, N. J. Waitzman, P. S. Romano, and J. Mulinare Reevaluating the Benefits of Folic Acid Fortification in the United States: Economic Analysis, Regulation, and Public Health Am J Public Health, November 1, 2005; 95(11): 1917 - 1922. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. Koo, P. O'Carroll, and M. LaVenture Public Health 101 for Informaticians J. Am. Med. Inform. Assoc., November 1, 2001; 8(6): 585 - 597. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. A. Honein, L. J. Paulozzi, T. J. Mathews, J. D. Erickson, and L.-Y. C. Wong Impact of Folic Acid Fortification of the US Food Supply on the Occurrence of Neural Tube Defects JAMA, June 20, 2001; 285(23): 2981 - 2986. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. S. Kloeblen and S. S. Batish Understanding the intention to permanently follow a high folate diet among a sample of low-income pregnant women according to the Health Belief Model Health Educ. Res., June 1, 1999; 14(3): 327 - 338. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |