|
|
||||||||
Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Gertrude H. Sergievsky Center, Columbia University, New York, NY 10032.
OBJECTIVES. The purpose of the study was to determine whether the obstetrical judgment of viability makes a difference to fetal and neonatal survival of extremely low birthweight infants (500-749 g). METHODS. We assessed the effect of the antenatal judgment of viability in a group of 66 infants born weighing from 500 to 749 g. These infants were alive at maternal hospital admission and were subsequently live-born or stillborn between January 1, 1984, and December 31, 1985. We related the antepartum assessment of viability and other factors recorded in the medical record to fetal survival and to postneonatal survival to hospital discharge. RESULTS. The obstetrical judgement of viability was strongly associated with outcome. After birthweight and gestational age were controlled, fetuses considered viable were 18 times more likely to survive (95% confidence interval = 2, 175) than those considered nonviable. CONCLUSIONS. The effects of obstetrical practices on perinatal mortality must be taken into consideration in estimating the survival potential of very small fetuses and in evaluating the relationship between survival and disability.
Related articles in AJPH:
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
J. Ohlinger, A. Kantak, J. P. Lavin Jr, O. Fofah, E. Hagen, G. Suresh, L. P. Halamek, and J. A. Schriefer Evaluation and Development of Potentially Better Practices for Perinatal and Neonatal Communication and Collaboration Pediatrics, November 1, 2006; 118(Supplement_2): S147 - S152. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Zabari, G. Suresh, M. Tomlinson, J. P. Lavin Jr, K. Larison, L. Halamek, and J. A. Schriefer Implementation and Case-Study Results of Potentially Better Practices for Collaboration Between Obstetrics and Neonatology to Achieve Improved Perinatal Outcomes Pediatrics, November 1, 2006; 118(Supplement_2): S153 - S158. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. P. Lavin Jr, A. Kantak, J. Ohlinger, J. W. Kaempf, M. Tomlinson, B. Campbell, O. Fofah, W. Edwards, K. Allbright, E. Hagen, et al. Attitudes of Obstetric and Pediatric Health Care Providers Toward Resuscitation of Infants Who Are Born at the Margins of Viability Pediatrics, November 1, 2006; 118(Supplement_2): S169 - S176. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. M. Peerzada, J. Schollin, and S. Hakansson Delivery room decision-making for extremely preterm infants in Sweden. Pediatrics, June 1, 2006; 117(6): 1988 - 1995. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. J. Boyle Ethical Issues in the Care of the Neonate: Overview NeoReviews, November 1, 2004; 5(11): e471 - e476. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P I Macfarlane, S Wood, and J Bennett Non-viable delivery at 20-23 weeks gestation: observations and signs of life after birth Arch. Dis. Child. Fetal Neonatal Ed., May 1, 2003; 88(3): F199 - F202. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. L. Streiner, S. Saigal, E. Burrows, B. Stoskopf, and P. Rosenbaum Attitudes of Parents and Health Care Professionals Toward Active Treatment of Extremely Premature Infants Pediatrics, July 1, 2001; 108(1): 152 - 157. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H. A. Hein and M. A. Lofgren The Changing Pattern of Neonatal Mortality in a Regionalized System of Perinatal Care: A Current Update Pediatrics, November 1, 1999; 104(5): 1064 - 1069. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
N. N. Finer and K. J. Barrington Decision-making in Delivery Room Resuscitation: A Team Sport Pediatrics, September 1, 1998; 102(3): 644 - 644. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |