|
|
||||||||
Division of Epidemiology, School of Public Health, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis 55454-1015.
OBJECTIVES. The Minnesota Heart Health Program was a research and demonstration project designed to reduce risk factors for heart disease in whole communities. This paper describes smoking-specific interventions and outcomes. METHODS. Three pairs of matched communities were included in the study. After baseline surveys, one community in each pair received a 5-year education program, while both cross-sectional and cohort surveys continued in all sites. Adult education programs for smoking cessation included Quit and Win contests, classes, self-help materials, telephone support, and home correspondence programs. RESULTS. Encouraging short-term results were obtained for several adult education programs. Overall long-term outcomes were mixed, with evidence of an intervention effect only for women in cross-sectional survey data. Unexpectedly strong secular declines in smoking prevalence were observed in comparison communities. CONCLUSIONS. The findings suggest that community education may be unlikely to exceed dramatic secular reductions in smoking prevalence. The success of several key interventions and the incorporation of Minnesota Heart Health Program interventions by education communities are encouraging, however.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
E. A Gilpin, K. Messer, M. M White, and J. P Pierce What contributed to the major decline in per capita cigarette consumption during California's comprehensive tobacco control programme? Tob. Control, August 1, 2006; 15(4): 308 - 316. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
F. A. Stillman, A. M. Hartman, B. I. Graubard, E. A. Gilpin, D. M. Murray, and J. T. Gibson Evaluation of the American Stop Smoking Intervention Study (ASSIST): A Report of Outcomes J Natl Cancer Inst, November 19, 2003; 95(22): 1681 - 1691. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. Merzel and J. D'Afflitti Reconsidering Community-Based Health Promotion: Promise, Performance, and Potential Am J Public Health, April 1, 2003; 93(4): 557 - 574. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
B. Thompson, E. Lichtenstein, K. Corbett, L. Nettekoven, and Z. Feng Durability of tobacco control efforts in the 22 Community Intervention Trial for Smoking Cessation (COMMIT) communities 2 years after the end of intervention Health Educ. Res., June 1, 2000; 15(3): 353 - 366. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Cheadle, T. D. Sterling, T. L. Schmid, and S. B. Fawcett Promising community-level indicators for evaluating cardiovascular health-promotion programs Health Educ. Res., February 1, 2000; 15(1): 109 - 116. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. CHAPMAN The news on tobacco control: time to bring the background into the foreground Tob. Control, September 1, 1999; 8(3): 237 - 239. [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
T. Korhonen, E.-L. Urjanheimo, P. Mannonen, H. J Korhonen, A. Uutela, and P. Puska Quit and Win campaigns as a long-term anti-smoking intervention in North Karelia and other parts of Finland Tob. Control, June 1, 1999; 8(2): 175 - 181. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
A. Cheadle, E. Wagner, C. Anderman, M. Walls, C. McBride, M. A. Bell, R. F. Catalano, and E. Pettigrew Measuring Community Mobilization in the Seattle Minority Youth Health Project Eval Rev, December 1, 1998; 22(6): 699 - 716. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |