|
|
||||||||
Mental Health and Social Welfare Research Group, University of California, Berkeley 94720, USA.
Quality of care is widely assumed to be related to patient outcomes, but little is known about care in relation to outcomes in county general hospital psychiatric emergency services. It was hypothesized that conformity to professional standards (technical quality) and engagement of the patient (artful care) in psychiatric emergency services evaluations would contribute to improved patient functioning (Global Assessment Scale score) and appropriate disposition. A total of 583 cases in seven facilities were analyzed. Conformity to technical standards of care was associated with retention even after constraints, biases, and admission criteria had been taken into account. Conversely, artful care was associated with lower probability of retention and improved functioning.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
L. George, J. Durbin, T. Sheldon, and P. Goering Patient and Contextual Factors Related to the Decision to Hospitalize Patients From Emergency Psychiatric Services Psychiatr Serv, December 1, 2002; 53(12): 1586 - 1591. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. P. Segal, T. A. Laurie, and M. J. Segal Factors in the Use of Coercive Retention in Civil Commitment Evaluations in Psychiatric Emergency Services Psychiatr Serv, April 1, 2001; 52(4): 514 - 520. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. P. Segal, P. D. Akutsu, and M. A. Watson Factors Associated With Involuntary Return to a Psychiatric Emergency Service Within 12 Months Psychiatr Serv, September 1, 1998; 49(9): 1212 - 1217. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |