AJPH
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


American Journal of Public Health, Vol. 84, Issue 9 1515-1520, Copyright © 1994 by American Public Health Association

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Mariner, W K
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Mariner, W K
Patients' rights after health care reform: who decides what is medically necessary?

W K Mariner

School of Public Health, Boston University, MA 02118-2394.

President Clinton's Health Security Act entitles individuals not to unlimited health care, but to a package of defined insurance benefits with specific exclusions and limitations. Like virtually all reform proposals, it would limit covered benefits to services that are medically necessary. If health reform is to control costs, not all medically necessary care can be covered. In the absence of a generally accepted definition of medical necessity, many services will not be guaranteed to all patients unless they are explicitly covered in the federal legislation or regulations. Without a federal definition of medical necessity or regulations listing covered services, health insurance plans will retain the primary authority to decide what is medically necessary for their patient subscribers.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J Law Med EthicsHome page
E. H. Morreim
Quality of Life: Erosions and Opportunities Under Managed Care
J. Law Med. Ethics, June 1, 2000; 28(2): 144 - 158.
[PDF]


Home page
J Law Med EthicsHome page
W. K. Mariner
Business vs. Medical Ethics: Conflicting Standards for Managed Care
J. Law Med. Ethics, September 1, 1995; 23(3): 236 - 246.
[PDF]


Home page
NEJMHome page
G. J. Annas
When Should Preventive Treatment Be Paid for by Health Insurance?
N. Engl. J. Med., October 13, 1994; 331(15): 1027 - 1030.
[Full Text]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1994 by the American Public Health Association