HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Full Text (PDF) Submit a response Purchase Article View Shopping Cart Alert me when this article is cited Alert me when eLetters are posted Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Meier, K J Articles by McFarlane, D R Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Meier, K J Articles by McFarlane, D R

State family planning and abortion expenditures: their effect on public health.

K J Meier and D R McFarlane

Department of Political Science, University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee 53201.

OBJECTIVES. This study examines whether state family planning expenditures and abortion funding for Medicaid-eligible women might reduce the number of low-birthweight babies, babies with late or no prenatal care, and premature births, as well as the rates of infant and neonatal mortality. METHODS. Using a pooled time-series analysis from 1982 to 1988 with the 50 states as units of analysis, this study assessed the impact of family planning expenditures and abortion funding on several public health outcomes while controlling for other important variables and statistical problems inherent in pooled time-series studies. RESULTS. States that funded abortions had a significantly higher rate of abortions and significantly lower rates of teen pregnancy, low-birthweight babies, premature births, and births with late or no prenatal care. States that had higher expenditures for family planning had significantly fewer abortions, low-birthweight babies, births with late or no prenatal care, infant deaths, and neonatal deaths. CONCLUSIONS. Funding abortions for Medicaid-eligible women and increasing the level of expenditures for family planning are associated with major differences in infant and maternal health in the United States.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				D. R. McFarlane and K. J. Meier Do Different Funding Mechanisms Produce Different Results? The Implications of Family Planning for Fiscal Federalism Journal of Health Politics Policy and Law, January 1, 1998; 23(3): 423 - 454. [Abstract] [PDF]

				B. R. Gottlieb Abortion -- 1995 N. Engl. J. Med., February 23, 1995; 332(8): 532 - 533. [Full Text]