HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Full Text (PDF) Submit a response Purchase Article View Shopping Cart Alert me when this article is cited Alert me when eLetters are posted Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Mustard, C A Articles by Roos, N P Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Mustard, C A Articles by Roos, N P

The relationship of prenatal care and pregnancy complications to birthweight in Winnipeg, Canada.

C A Mustard and N P Roos

Manitoba Centre for Health Policy and Evaluation, Department of Community Health Sciences, Winnipeg, Canada.

OBJECTIVES. Prenatal care is commonly understood to have a beneficial impact on birthweight. This study describes socioeconomic differences in utilization of prenatal medical care and birthweight in a population with universal health insurance. METHODS. Measures of prenatal care utilization, incidence of pregnancy complications, and birthweight were obtained from physician reimbursement claims and hospital separation abstracts for 12,646 pregnant women. Maternal socioeconomic status was derived from small-area census data. RESULTS. Infants born to women in the poorest income quintile had lower birthweights than infants born to wealthier women. Much of the difference was associated with a higher prevalence of complications, smoking, unmarried status, and inadequate prenatal care among low-income women. The difference in birthweight between adequate and less than adequate care groups was small, and the benefit associated with prenatal care was no greater among women with pregnancy complications. CONCLUSIONS. The lower utilization of prenatal care by poorer women accounted for a small proportion of the difference in birthweight. Socioeconomic differences in birthweight are primarily attributable to factors not directly influenced by early prenatal medical care.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				C. A. Partridge and J. R. Holman Effects of a Reduced-Visit Prenatal Care Clinical Practice Guideline J Am Board Fam Med, November 1, 2005; 18(6): 555 - 560. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. Z. Goldani, M. A. Barbieri, A. A. M. Silva, and H. Bettiol Trends in Prenatal Care Use and Low Birthweight in Southeast Brazil Am J Public Health, August 1, 2004; 94(8): 1366 - 1371. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				L. Castro, K. Yolton, B. Haberman, N. Roberto, N. I. Hansen, N. Ambalavanan, B. R. Vohr, and E. F. Donovan Bias in Reported Neurodevelopmental Outcomes Among Extremely Low Birth Weight Survivors Pediatrics, August 1, 2004; 114(2): 404 - 410. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				N. P. Roos, E. Forget, R. Walld, and L. MacWilliam Does universal comprehensive insurance encourage unnecessary use? Evidence from Manitoba says "no" Can. Med. Assoc. J., January 20, 2004; 170(2): 209 - 214. [Abstract] [Full Text]

				W. Sword Prenatal Care Use Among Women of Low Income: A Matter of "Taking Care of Self" Qual Health Res, March 1, 2003; 13(3): 319 - 332. [Abstract] [PDF]

				C. J. Conover, P. J. Rankin, and F. A. Sloan Effects of Tennessee Medicaid Managed Care On Obstetrical Care and Birth Outcomes Journal of Health Politics Policy and Law, December 1, 2001; 26(6): 1291 - 1324. [Abstract] [PDF]

				S. M. Yu, G. R. Alexander, R. Schwalberg, and M. D. Kogan Prenatal Care Use Among Selected Asian American Groups Am J Public Health, November 1, 2001; 91(11): 1865 - 1868. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. D. Kogan, G. R. Alexander, M. Kotelchuck, M. F. MacDorman, P. Buekens, J. A. Martin, and E. Papiernik Trends in Twin Birth Outcomes and Prenatal Care Utilization in the United States, 1981-1997 JAMA, July 19, 2000; 284(3): 335 - 341. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. D. Kogan, G. R. Alexander, B. W. Jack, and M. C. Allen The Association Between Adequacy of Prenatal Care Utilization and Subsequent Pediatric Care Utilization in the United States Pediatrics, July 1, 1998; 102(1): 25 - 30. [Abstract] [Full Text]

				C. A. Mustard, P. Kaufert, A. Kozyrskyj, and T. Mayer Sex Differences in the Use of Health Care Services N. Engl. J. Med., June 4, 1998; 338(23): 1678 - 1683. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. D. Kogan, J. A. Martin, G. R. Alexander, M. Kotelchuck, S. J. Ventura, and F. D. Frigoletto The Changing Pattern of Prenatal Care Utilization in the United States, 1981-1995, Using Different Prenatal Care Indices JAMA, May 27, 1998; 279(20): 1623 - 1628. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				K. D. Frick and P. M. Lantz Selection Bias in Prenatal Care Utilization: An Interdisciplinary Framework and Review of the Literature Med Care Res Rev, December 1, 1996; 53(4): 371 - 396. [Abstract] [PDF]