|
|
||||||||
Department of Family Medicine, University of Texas Medical Branch at Galveston 77555-0853.
The risks and benefits of postexposure rabies prophylaxis were analyzed from clinical and economic perspectives. A decision-analytic model was constructed by using probability and outcome data from the literature and the state health department. Health outcomes were measured in quality-adjusted life years. In the base case (overweight adult male), treatment is optimal when the probability of animal rabidity is greater than 1 in 2000. Sensitivity analysis showed robustness in the treatment decision; however, the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio ($140,000/quality-adjusted life year) is sensitive to the rabidity probability. Treatment is optimal from the patient's perspective; however, it may not be cost-effective when the probability of rabidity is low.
Related articles in AJPH:
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
A. C. Caviness, G. J. Demmler, J. M. Swint, and S. B. Cantor Cost-effectiveness Analysis of Herpes Simplex Virus Testing and Treatment Strategies in Febrile Neonates Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med, July 1, 2008; 162(7): 665 - 674. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |