HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Full Text (PDF) Submit a response Purchase Article View Shopping Cart Alert me when this article is cited Alert me when eLetters are posted Alert me if a correction is posted Services Related articles in AJPH Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Mauldon, J Articles by McGuigan, K A Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Mauldon, J Articles by McGuigan, K A

Rationing or rationalizing children's medical care: comparison of a Medicaid HMO with fee-for-service care.

J Mauldon, A Leibowitz, J L Buchanan, C Damberg and K A McGuigan

Graduate School of Public Policy, University of California at Berkeley.

OBJECTIVES. This paper examines how medical care obtained by children enrolled in a Medicaid health maintenance organization (HMO) differs from that obtained by similar children who receive care from fee-for-service Medicaid providers. METHODS. In a randomized trial, some Medicaid households were assigned to remain in a traditional fee-for-service arrangement and others were randomly selected to join a Medicaid prepaid plan (an HMO). Participating households recorded data on children's health status and use of medical care. RESULTS. The prepaid plan members and the fee-for-service recipients received equivalent numbers of checkup visits, but the children in the prepaid plan made significantly fewer acute care visits. This plan appeared to target its services to children with the greatest health care needs. However, the content of health visits in the two systems did not differ, nor did prepaid and fee-for-service enrollees use the emergency room differently. CONCLUSIONS. It is possible to design a Medicaid HMO that achieves financial savings without reducing services to the most vulnerable patients. However, these findings alone do not provide a basis for widespread policy change in the direction of Medicaid HMOs. Further research is needed to establish whether the children treated in the HMO differed in health outcomes from those treated by fee-for-service care.

Related articles in AJPH:

Why a rising tide doesn't lift all the boats: Medicaid and medical care for children.

G A Silver
AJPH 1994 84: 893-894. [PDF]  

This article has been cited by other articles:

				J. A. Finkelstein, M. B. Barton, J. G. Donahue, P. Algatt-Bergstrom, L. E. Markson, and R. Platt Comparing Asthma Care for Medicaid and Non-Medicaid Children in a Health Maintenance Organization Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med, June 1, 2000; 154(6): 563 - 568. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				P. W. Newacheck, M. Pearl, D. C. Hughes, and N. Halfon The Role of Medicaid in Ensuring Children's Access to Care JAMA, November 25, 1998; 280(20): 1789 - 1793. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				A. Gadomski, P. Jenkins, and M. Nichols Impact of a Medicaid Primary Care Provider and Preventive Care on Pediatric Hospitalization Pediatrics, March 1, 1998; 101 (3): e1 - e1. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]