AJPH
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


American Journal of Public Health, Vol. 84, Issue 1 72-76, Copyright © 1994 by American Public Health Association

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Rodgers, A B
Right arrow Articles by Mathews, O
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Rodgers, A B
Right arrow Articles by Mathews, O
"Eat for Health": a supermarket intervention for nutrition and cancer risk reduction.

A B Rodgers, L G Kessler, B Portnoy, A L Potosky, B Patterson, J Tenney, F E Thompson, S M Krebs-Smith, N Breen and O Mathews

Prospect Associates, Rockville, Md.

OBJECTIVES. The results of an evaluation of "Eat for Health," a supermarket nutrition intervention, are presented. The study tested whether such a program could be successfully carried out and whether it could effect changes in knowledge, attitudes, and food purchasing behavior in line with nutrition and cancer risk reduction guidelines. METHODS. The evaluation consisted of an in-store monitoring element, an in-store and telephone consumer survey, and an analysis of sales data on selected foods. A matched-pair design, using a total of 40 stores in the intervention and comparison groups, was used. RESULTS. The intervention was successfully implemented and had limited success in changing some food purchasing behaviors. There appeared to be no effect on knowledge and attitudes except for increased awareness of a link between diet and cancer and of the program itself. CONCLUSIONS. Despite the intervention's success, limitations of the consumer survey and sales data analyses and the continuing diffusion of nutrition messages throughout society make it difficult to specify the impact of this program on consumer nutrition knowledge and behaviors.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Health Educ BehavHome page
R. N. Acharya, P. M. Patterson, E. P. Hill, T. G. Schmitz, and E. Bohm
An Evaluation of the "TrEAT Yourself Well" Restaurant Nutrition Campaign
Health Educ Behav, June 1, 2006; 33(3): 309 - 324.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Diabetes CareHome page
E. B. Fisher, E. A. Walker, A. Bostrom, B. Fischhoff, D. Haire-Joshu, and S. B. Johnson
Behavioral Science Research in the Prevention of Diabetes : Status and opportunities
Diabetes Care, March 1, 2002; 25(3): 599 - 606.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Health PsycholHome page
E. S. Anderson, R. A. Winett, P. G. Bickley, J. Walberg-Rankin, J. F. Moore, M. Leahy, C. E. Harris, and R. E. Gerkin
The Effects of a Multimedia System in Supermarkets To Alter Shoppers' Food Purchases: Nutritional Outcomes and Caveats
J Health Psychol, April 1, 1997; 2(2): 209 - 223.
[Abstract]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1994 by the American Public Health Association