|
|
||||||||
Fox Chase Cancer Center, Cheltenham, PA 19012.
This study evaluated interventions implemented with women in a health maintenance organization who had not utilized their annual free mammogram referral 45 days (step 2) and 95 days (step 3) after its mailing. The step 2 evaluation compared mammography utilization for women randomly assigned to receive a brief reminder letter or no reminder: 42% of the reminder group vs 28% of the control group obtained mammograms. The step 3 evaluation compared utilization for women randomly assigned to receive a second reminder, a letter suggesting a preventive office visit, or telephone counseling: 29% of those who received telephone counseling, 14% of those who received a letter, and 12% of those who received a second reminder obtained mammograms.
Related articles in AJPH:
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
S. A. Becker and M. Foxall An analysis of health behavior theories applied to breast-screening behavior for relevance with american Indian women. J Transcult Nurs, July 1, 2006; 17(3): 272 - 279. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. S. Slater, G. A. Henly, C. N. Ha, M. E. Malone, J. A. Nyman, S. Diaz, and P. G. McGovern Effect of Direct Mail as a Population-Based Strategy to Increase Mammography Use among Low-Income Underinsured Women Ages 40 to 64 Years Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev., October 1, 2005; 14(10): 2346 - 2352. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. Michielutte, P. C. Sharp, K. L. Foley, L. E. Cunningham, J. G. Spangler, E. D. Paskett, and L. D. Case Intervention to increase screening mammography among women 65 and older Health Educ. Res., April 1, 2005; 20(2): 149 - 162. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. S. West, P. Greene, L. Pulley, P. Kratt, S. Gore, H. Weiss, and N. Siegfried Stepped-Care, Community Clinic Interventions to Promote Mammography Use among Low-Income Rural African American Women Health Educ Behav, August 1, 2004; 31(4_suppl): 29S - 44S. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. R. Andersen, M. Hager, C. Su, and N. Urban Analysis of the Cost-Effectiveness of Mammography Promotion by Volunteers in Rural Communities Health Educ Behav, December 1, 2002; 29(6): 755 - 770. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. Lazovich, D. L. Parker, L. M. Brosseau, F. T. Milton, S. K. Dugan, W. Pan, and L. Hock Effectiveness of a Worksite Intervention to Reduce an Occupational Exposure: The Minnesota Wood Dust Study Am J Public Health, September 1, 2002; 92(9): 1498 - 1505. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
V. M. Taylor, T. G. Hislop, J. C. Jackson, S.-P. Tu, Y. Yasui, S. M. Schwartz, C. Teh, A. Kuniyuki, E. Acorda, A. Marchand, et al. A Randomized Controlled Trial of Interventions to Promote Cervical Cancer Screening Among Chinese Women in North America J Natl Cancer Inst, May 1, 2002; 94(9): 670 - 677. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. Legler, H. I. Meissner, C. Coyne, N. Breen, V. Chollette, and B. K. Rimer The Effectiveness of Interventions To Promote Mammography among Women with Historically Lower Rates of Screening Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev., January 1, 2002; 11(1): 59 - 71. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
L. A. Crane, T. A. Leakey, G. Ehrsam, B. K. Rimer, and R. B. Warnecke Effectiveness and Cost-Effectiveness of Multiple Outcalls to Promote Mammography among Low-Income Women Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev., September 1, 2000; 9(9): 923 - 931. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
S. H. Taplin, W. E. Barlow, E. Ludman, R. MacLehos, D. M. Meyer, D. Seger, D. Herta, C. Chin, and S. Curry Testing Reminder and Motivational Telephone Calls to Increase Screening Mammography: a Randomized Study J Natl Cancer Inst, February 2, 2000; 92(3): 233 - 242. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
E. J. Ludman, S. J. Curry, D. Meyer, and S. H. Taplin Implementation of Outreach Telephone Counseling to Promote Mammography Participation Health Educ Behav, October 1, 1999; 26(5): 689 - 702. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. R. Yabroff and J. S. Mandelblatt Interventions Targeted toward Patients to Increase Mammography Use Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev., September 1, 1999; 8(9): 749 - 757. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
J. S. Mandelblatt and K. R. Yabroff Effectiveness of Interventions Designed to Increase Mammography Use: A Meta-Analysis of Provider-targeted Strategies Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev., September 1, 1999; 8(9): 759 - 767. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
E. D. Paskett, C. M. Tatum, R. DAgostino Jr., J. Rushing, R. Velez, R. Michielutte, and M. Dignan Community-based Interventions to Improve Breast and Cervical Cancer Screening: Results of the Forsyth County Cancer Screening (FoCaS) Project Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev., May 1, 1999; 8(5): 453 - 459. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
S. W. Vernon Risk Perception and Risk Communication for Cancer Screening Behaviors: a Review J Natl Cancer Inst Monographs, January 1, 1999; 1999(25): 101 - 119. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
M. A. Clark, W. Rakowski, B. Ehrich, D. N. Pearlman, M. Goldstein, C. E. Dube, B. K. Rimer, and H. Woolverton Stages of Adopting Regular Screening Mammography: Do Women Differ in Decisional Balance Within Stages? J Health Psychol, October 1, 1998; 3(4): 491 - 506. [Abstract] |
||||
![]() |
E. S. King, E. Ross, J. Seay, A. Balshem, and B. Rimer Mammography Interventions for 65- to 74-Year-Old HMO Women: Program Effectiveness and Predictors of Use J Aging Health, November 1, 1995; 7(4): 529 - 551. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |