|
|
||||||||
Institute for Health Promotion and Disease Prevention Research, University of Southern California-Alhambra 91803-1358.
OBJECTIVES. We present 1-year follow-up data from a school-based tobacco use prevention project designed to test the effectiveness of three main components of social influence programs. The components teach refusal skills, awareness of social misperceptions about tobacco use, and misconceptions about physical consequences. METHODS. Four different curricula were developed and tested in a randomized experiment involving 48 junior high schools. The outcome variables examined were changes in initial and weekly cigarette and smokeless tobacco use 1 year after the intervention. RESULTS. Analyses indicated that each of the component programs were effective in decreasing both the initial and the weekly use of cigarettes except for the curriculum in which refusal skills were taught. Also, each curriculum was effective in decreasing the initial use of smokeless tobacco except for the one aimed at correcting social misperceptions. Only the combined curriculum showed an effect on the weekly use of smokeless tobacco. CONCLUSIONS. The combined intervention was the most effective overall in reducing the initial and weekly use of cigarettes and smokeless tobacco. This suggests that different reasons for use exist and need to be counteracted simultaneously. However, since single programs were also effective in reducing all but weekly smokeless tobacco use, any of these components may be worthwhile prevention tools.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
J. F. Hollis, M. R. Polen, E. P. Whitlock, E. Lichtenstein, J. P. Mullooly, W. F. Velicer, and C. A. Redding Teen Reach: Outcomes From a Randomized, Controlled Trial of a Tobacco Reduction Program for Teens Seen in Primary Medical Care Pediatrics, April 1, 2005; 115(4): 981 - 989. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Ausems, I. Mesters, G. van Breukelen, and H. De Vries Effects of in-school and tailored out-of-school smoking prevention among Dutch vocational school students Health Educ. Res., February 1, 2004; 19(1): 51 - 63. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C L Backinger, P Fagan, E Matthews, and R Grana Adolescent and young adult tobacco prevention and cessation: current status and future directions Tob. Control, December 1, 2003; 12(90004): iv46 - 53. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. W. Valente, B. R. Hoffman, A. Ritt-Olson, K. Lichtman, and C. A. Johnson Effects of a Social-Network Method for Group Assignment Strategies on Peer-Led Tobacco Prevention Programs in Schools Am J Public Health, November 1, 2003; 93(11): 1837 - 1843. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. M. Blake, H. Amaro, P. M. Schwartz, and L. J. Flinchbaugh A Review of Substance Abuse Prevention Interventions for Young Adolescent Girls The Journal of Early Adolescence, August 1, 2001; 21(3): 294 - 324. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. C. Mahoney, B. Stengel, S. McMullen, and S. Brown Evaluation of a Youth Tobacco Education Program: Student, Teacher, and Presenter Perspectives The Journal of School Nursing, October 1, 2000; 16(4): 16 - 21. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Stead, G. Hastings, and C. Tudor-Smith Preventing adolescent smoking: a review of options Health Education Journal, January 1, 1996; 55(1): 31 - 54. [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. Bolinger Smoking Prevention in Childhood Cancer Survivors Journal of Pediatric Oncology Nursing, January 1, 1994; 11(4): 167 - 171. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |