AJPH
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


American Journal of Public Health, Vol. 83, Issue 7 1002-1005, Copyright © 1993 by American Public Health Association

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Elcock, M
Right arrow Articles by Kelzer, P J
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Elcock, M
Right arrow Articles by Kelzer, P J
Active AIDS surveillance: hospital-based case finding in a metropolitan California county.

M Elcock, T Simon, B P Gilbert, A G Copello and P J Kelzer

AIDS Program, San Mateo County Department of Health Services, CA.

OBJECTIVES. Health departments that use passive surveillance alone cannot be sure of the level of complete and accurate reporting of acquired immunodeficiency syndrome (AIDS) cases. We sought to develop a model of active AIDS case reporting using limited county resources. METHODS. A validation study of AIDS case reporting using discharge diagnosis codes was undertaken to assess underreporting. Hospital-specific protocols for active surveillance were developed. RESULTS. The validation study revealed that 24% of AIDS cases in all hospitals were not reported through passive surveillance in 1990. In the first 3 months of 1991, active surveillance identified nine unreported cases (69% of the total cases reported) in one hospital. These underreporting estimates far exceed the 15% national underreporting rate estimated by the Centers for Disease Control. CONCLUSIONS. A method of hospital-based case finding was developed and serves as the model for implementing an ongoing program of active surveillance needed to ensure complete, accurate, and timely reporting of diagnosed AIDS cases. Application of this model may be helpful in attempts to minimize underreporting.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Am J EpidemiolHome page
T. J. Doyle, M. K. Glynn, and S. L. Groseclose
Completeness of Notifiable Infectious Disease Reporting in the United States: An Analytical Literature Review
Am. J. Epidemiol., May 1, 2002; 155(9): 866 - 874.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1993 by the American Public Health Association