AJPH
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


American Journal of Public Health, Vol. 83, Issue 5 758-766, Copyright © 1993 by American Public Health Association

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Lerner, B H
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Lerner, B H
New York City's tuberculosis control efforts: the historical limitations of the "war on consumption".

B H Lerner

Robert Wood Johnson Clinical Scholars Program, University of Washington, Seattle 98105.

New York City began America's first campaign to control tuberculosis in 1893, and the disease declined until the 1970s. Throughout the 20th century, New York relied on three control strategies: screening, supervised therapy, and detention of noncompliant persons. Officials consistently identified the persistent foci of tuberculosis to be minorities and the poor, and they concentrated efforts among these populations. Recently, however, in the setting of rising human immunodeficiency virus infection and homelessness, tuberculosis--including multidrug-resistant strains--has returned to New York with a vengeance. Tuberculosis control in the city has been limited by two problems that hamper many public health programs: (1) antituberculosis measures, while appropriately targeting the poor, have been inconsistently funded and poorly coordinated; and (2) efforts have emphasized detection and treatment of individual cases rather than improvement of underlying social conditions. Renewed efforts by New York and other cities must address these limitations.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Am. J. Public HealthHome page
G. Bukhman and A. Kidder
Cardiovascular Disease and Global Health Equity: Lessons From Tuberculosis Control Then and Now
Am J Public Health, January 1, 2008; 98(1): 44 - 54.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Public HealthHome page
J. Colgrove
The McKeown Thesis: A Historical Controversy and Its Enduring Influence
Am J Public Health, May 1, 2002; 92(5): 725 - 729.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Public HealthHome page
R. G. Barr, A. V. Diez-Roux, C. A. Knirsch, and A. Pablos-Mendez
Neighborhood Poverty and the Resurgence of Tuberculosis in New York City, 1984-1992
Am J Public Health, September 1, 2001; 91(9): 1487 - 1493.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ChestHome page
B. H. Lerner
Catching Patients: Tuberculosis and Detention in the 1990s
Chest, January 1, 1999; 115(1): 236 - 241.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of Health Politics, Policy and LawHome page
S. N. Tesh
Miasma and "Social Factors" in Disease Causality: Lessons from the Nineteenth Century
Journal of Health Politics Policy and Law, December 1, 1995; 20(4): 1001 - 1024.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
J Law Med EthicsHome page
M. T. Fullilove, R. Young, P. G. Panzer, and P. Muskin
Psychosocial Issues in the Management of Patients with Tuberculosis
J. Law Med. Ethics, September 1, 1993; 21(3-4): 324 - 331.
[PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1993 by the American Public Health Association