AJPH
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


American Journal of Public Health, Vol. 83, Issue 3 356-362, Copyright © 1993 by American Public Health Association

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Melin, A L
Right arrow Articles by Bygren, L O
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Melin, A L
Right arrow Articles by Bygren, L O
The cost-effectiveness of rehabilitation in the home: a study of Swedish elderly.

A L Melin, S Håkansson and L O Bygren

Department of Social Medicine, University of Umeå, Stockholm, Sweden.

OBJECTIVES. To investigate whether care of elderly and disabled patients could be more cost-effective after a short-term hospital stay, we examined the impact of a primary home care intervention program on functional status, use and costs of care after 6 months. METHODS. When clinically ready for discharge from the hospital, chronically ill patients with dependence in one to five functions in personal activities of daily living were randomized to physician-led primary home care with a 24-hour service, and the controls were offered ordinary care. Physical, cognitive, social, and medical functions were assessed in 110 team subjects and 73 controls. Data regarding inpatient days and outpatient visits were collected and converted to costs. RESULTS. Team patients demonstrated better instrumental activities of daily living and outdoor walking and significantly fewer diagnoses and drugs at 6 months. They used less inpatient and more outpatient care compared with the control patients. Significant cost reductions were found in the team group. CONCLUSIONS. This primary home care intervention program is cost-effective, at least for a selection of patients at risk for long-term hospital care.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Gerontol. A Biol. Sci. Med. Sci.Home page
B. Leff and J. R. Burton
The Future History of Home Care and Physician House Calls in the United States
J. Gerontol. A Biol. Sci. Med. Sci., October 1, 2001; 56(10): M603 - 608.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Eval Health ProfHome page
D. Wieland, A. E. Stuck, A. L. Siu, J. adams, and L. Z. Rubenstein
Meta-Analytic Methods for Health Services Research: An Example from Geriatrics
Eval Health Prof, September 1, 1995; 18(3): 252 - 282.
[Abstract] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1993 by the American Public Health Association