AJPH
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


American Journal of Public Health, Vol. 83, Issue 3 322-328, Copyright © 1993 by American Public Health Association

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Related articles in AJPH
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Rosenblatt, R A
Right arrow Articles by Hart, L G
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Rosenblatt, R A
Right arrow Articles by Hart, L G
The effect of federal grants on medical schools' production of primary care physicians.

R A Rosenblatt, M E Whitcomb, T J Cullen, D M Lishner and L G Hart

Department of Family Medicine, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle 98195.

OBJECTIVES. Title VII of the Health Professions Educational Assistance Act of 1976 was created to encourage the production of primary care physicians. This study explored recent trends in the proportion of US medical school graduates entering primary care in relationship to Title VII funding. METHODS. The American Medical Association Physician Masterfile was used to determine the specialty choice of all students graduating from American medical schools between 1960 and 1985. RESULTS. The proportion of graduates entering primary care rose from 19.7% in 1967 to 31.1% in 1976 and remained stable for the subsequent decade. The increase occurred before implementation of Title VII. Rural, state-owned medical schools with departments of family medicine tend to produce a greater proportion of primary care physicians than urban private schools without family medicine departments. CONCLUSIONS. The values of American medical schools and the reward structure of American medical practice favor the production of specialists over primary care physicians. Although Title VII helped to encourage and sustain the development of primary care educational programs at both the medical student and graduate levels, an increase in the proportion of primary care physicians will require fundamental changes.


Related articles in AJPH:

Access to comprehensive health services is fundamental.
M Sapir
AJPH 1994 84: 1034. [PDF]  



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Eval Health ProfHome page
G. Xu, M. Hojat, J. J. Veloski, and J. S. Gonnella
The Changing Health Care System: A Research Agenda for Medical Education
Eval Health Prof, June 1, 1999; 22(2): 152 - 168.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of Health Politics, Policy and LawHome page
C. S. Weissert and S. L. Silberman
Sending a Policy Signal: State Legislatures, Medical Schools, and Primary Care Mandates
Journal of Health Politics Policy and Law, January 1, 1998; 23(5): 743 - 770.
[Abstract] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1993 by the American Public Health Association