AJPH
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


American Journal of Public Health, Vol. 83, Issue 2 233-239, Copyright © 1993 by American Public Health Association

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow A correction has been published
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Guidotti, T L
Right arrow Articles by Jacobs, P
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Guidotti, T L
Right arrow Articles by Jacobs, P
The implications of an epidemiological mistake: a community's response to a perceived excess cancer risk.

T L Guidotti and P Jacobs

Department of Health Services Administration and Community Medicine, University of Alberta Faculty of Medicine, Edmonton, Canada.

OBJECTIVES. The response of community residents to a perceived cancer excess may include changes in attitude, health-related behavior, and property values. In 1986, a cancer agency conducted a study of cancer incidence (1979 to 1983) in two suburbs of Edmonton, Alberta, and reported elevations on the order of 25% over expected for most sites. Reanalysis of these data several months later revealed an error. Correction brought the rates into line with Alberta as a whole and with other communities surrounding Edmonton. METHODS. We used public opinion trends and property value trends (during the period of concern) to study the two communities affected by the allegation of increased cancer risk. RESULTS. A survey of residents found significant differences at the time in health-related behavior and beliefs suggesting increased perception of personal, family, and community risk and modest changes in behavior. Real estate values in one community temporarily lost an average of $4000, or about 5% of total value, compared with a similar, adjacent housing market. CONCLUSIONS. The perception of an elevated cancer risk, in the absence of a true risk, may have a substantial negative effect on the affected community, both psychologically and economically.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Occup. Environ. Med.Home page
E Kokki, J Ranta, A Penttinen, E Pukkala, and J Pekkanen
Small area estimation of incidence of cancer around a known source of exposure with fine resolution data
Occup. Environ. Med., May 1, 2001; 58(5): 315 - 320.
[Abstract] [Full Text]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1993 by the American Public Health Association