HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Full Text (PDF) Submit a response Purchase Article View Shopping Cart Alert me when this article is cited Alert me when eLetters are posted Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Rigotti, N A Articles by Schelling, T Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Rigotti, N A Articles by Schelling, T

Retail stores' compliance with a city no-smoking law.

N A Rigotti, M A Stoto, M F Bierer, A Rosen and T Schelling

Institute for the Study of Smoking Behavior and Policy, John F. Kennedy School of Government, Harvard University, Cambridge, Mass.

OBJECTIVES. Laws restricting smoking in public places and workplaces can protect the public only if they are obeyed. We sought to assess compliance with a Cambridge, Mass, no-smoking ordinance. METHODS. We prospectively observed 174 retail stores 1 month before and 3, 11, and 24 months after the law took effect. At 24 months, we interviewed one employee per store. RESULTS. Full compliance with the law was low; at 24 months, only 4% of stores displayed the mandated sign and were free of smokers and smoke. Fewer than half the stores posted any no-smoking sign. Sign prevalence increased over 2 years (22% to 41%, P < .001), but the frequency of smoke or smokers (13% and 10%, respectively, at baseline) did not change. According to employees interviewed at 24 months, 38% of stores illegally permitted customers or employees to smoke. These stores had more smoke and fewer signs than did stores prohibiting smoking. Compliance was poor in liquor and convenience stores. Employees who had been told how to handle customers' smoking were more likely to enforce the law. CONCLUSIONS. Compliance with a no-smoking law is not guaranteed. For retail stores, compliance may improve if stores adopt no-smoking policies, post signs, and teach employees to enforce the law.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				D. T. Levy and K. B. Friend The effects of clean indoor air laws: what do we know and what do we need to know? Health Educ. Res., October 1, 2003; 18(5): 592 - 609. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				D. T Levy, K. Friend, and E. Polishchuk Effect of clean indoor air laws on smokers: the clean air module of the SimSmoke computer simulation model Tob. Control, December 1, 2001; 10(4): 345 - 351. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				A. M SALMON and C. RISSEL Smoking in enclosed shopping centres: employee and public responses to simulated violation Tob. Control, December 1, 1999; 8(4): 440 - 440. [Full Text]

				B. O'Grady, M. Asbridge, and T. Abernathy Analysis of factors related to illegal tobacco sales to young people in Ontario Tob. Control, September 1, 1999; 8(3): 301 - 305. [Abstract] [Full Text]