AJPH
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


American Journal of Public Health, Vol. 83, Issue 2 173-178, Copyright © 1993 by American Public Health Association

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Windsor, R A
Right arrow Articles by Glynn, T
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Windsor, R A
Right arrow Articles by Glynn, T
The dissemination of smoking cessation methods for pregnant women: achieving the year 2000 objectives.

R A Windsor, C Q Li, J B Lowe, L L Perkins, D Ershoff and T Glynn

School of Public Health, University of Alabama, Birmingham 35294-2041.

The smoking prevalence rate among adult women and pregnant women has decreased only 0.3 to 0.5% per year since 1969. Without a nationwide dissemination of efficacious smoking cessation methods based on these trends, by the year 2000 the smoking prevalence among pregnant women will be approximately 18%. This estimate is well above the US Department of Health and Human Services Year 2000 Objective of 10%. The US dissemination of tested smoking cessation methods could help an additional 12,900 to 155,000 pregnant smokers annually and 600,000 to 1,481,000 cumulatively to quit smoking during the 1990s. Dissemination could help achieve 31 to 78% of the Year 2000 Objectives for pregnancy smoking prevalence. (With dissemination, at best a 15% smoking prevalence during pregnancy, rather than the 10% objective, is likely to be observed.) Our results confirm a well-documented need for a national campaign to disseminate smoking cessation methods.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Health Educ BehavHome page
J. B. Lowe, K. P. Balanda, W. R. Stanton, C. D. Mar, and V. O'Connor
Dissemination of an Efficacious Antenatal Smoking Cessation Program in Public Hospitals in Australia: A Randomized Controlled Trial
Health Educ Behav, October 1, 2002; 29(5): 608 - 619.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Health Educ BehavHome page
R. A. Windsor, C. Q. Li, N. R. Boyd Jr., and K. E. Hartmann
The Use of Significant Reduction Rates to Evaluate Health Education Methods for Pregnant Smokers: A New Harm Reduction Behavioral Indicator?
Health Educ Behav, October 1, 1999; 26(5): 648 - 662.
[Abstract] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1993 by the American Public Health Association