HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Full Text (PDF) Submit a response Purchase Article View Shopping Cart Alert me when this article is cited Alert me when eLetters are posted Alert me if a correction is posted Services Related articles in AJPH Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Vernick, J S Articles by Teret, S P Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Vernick, J S Articles by Teret, S P

Firearms and health: the right to be armed with accurate information about the Second Amendment.

J S Vernick and S P Teret

Johns Hopkins School of Public Health Injury Prevention Center, Baltimore, Md.

An organized campaign by groups such as the National Rifle Association has sought to convince policymakers and others that the Second Amendment to the US Constitution grants an unfettered right to individuals to possess any firearm, free from federal or state regulation. Although advocates may debate the meaning that should be given to the Second Amendment, under the American legal system the meaning of any particular constitutional provision is determined by the controlling precedent of Supreme Court cases. Two cases, Presser v Illinois and United States v Miller, remain the Supreme Court's latest word on the meaning of the Second Amendment. In Presser, the Court held that the Second Amendment is applicable only to federal, not state, laws. In Miller and subsequent federal cases, any Second Amendment "right" to bear arms is closely linked to the preservation of state militias, upholding a variety of federal gun legislation. Unless the Supreme Court modifies or reverses its Presser and Miller decisions, health advocates should understand that the Second Amendment poses no obstacle to even broad gun control legislation.

Related articles in AJPH:

NRA claims distortions of Second Amendment in journal article.

P H Blackman and R E Gardiner
AJPH 1994 84: 1854-1856. [PDF]  

This article has been cited by other articles:

				J. S. Vernick, J. G. Hodge Jr., and D. W. Webster The Ethics of Restrictive Licensing for Handguns: Comparing the United States and Canadian Approaches to Handgun Regulation J. Law Med. Ethics, December 1, 2007; 35(4): 668 - 678. [PDF]

				J. S. Vernick and J. S. Mair How the Law Affects Gun Policy in the United States: Law as Intervention or Obstacle to Prevention J. Law Med. Ethics, December 1, 2002; 30(4): 692 - 704. [PDF]

				Committee on Injury and Poison Prevention Firearm-Related Injuries Affecting the Pediatric Population Pediatrics, April 1, 2000; 105(4): 888 - 895. [Abstract] [Full Text]

				V. C. Strasburger Duck and Take Cover Clinical Pediatrics, January 1, 1999; 38(1): 41 - 43. [PDF]

				V. C. Strasburger and E. Donnerstein Children, Adolescents, and the Media: Issues and Solutions Pediatrics, January 1, 1999; 103(1): 129 - 139. [Full Text] [PDF]

				S. P. Teret, D. W. Webster, J. S. Vernick, T. W. Smith, D. Leff, G. J. Wintemute, P. J. Cook, D. F. Hawkins, A. L. Kellermann, S. B. Sorenson, et al. Support for New Policies to Regulate Firearms -- Results of Two National Surveys N. Engl. J. Med., September 17, 1998; 339(12): 813 - 818. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				P. H. BLACKMAN A Critique of the Epidemiologic Study of Firearms and Homicide Homicide Studies, May 1, 1997; 1(2): 169 - 189. [Abstract]