|
|
||||||||
School of Social Work, University of Nebraska at Omaha 68182-0293.
This investigation sought to clarify which resistance strategies were associated with rape avoidance and at what cost. Data were gathered from initial and supplemental police reports about 150 sexual assault victims, ages 16 and older, who were assaulted between June 1, 1988, and May 31, 1989, in Omaha, Neb. Although this analysis could not determine causality, it did indicate that forceful verbal resistance, physical resistance, and fleeing were all associated with rape avoidance, whereas nonforceful verbal resistance and no resistance were associated with being raped. Further, women who used forceful resistance were no more likely to be injured than women who did not resist.
Related articles in AJPH:
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
C. A. Gidycz, A. Van Wynsberghe, and K. M. Edwards Prediction of Women's Utilization of Resistance Strategies in a Sexual Assault Situation: A Prospective Study J Interpers Violence, May 1, 2008; 23(5): 571 - 588. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. E. Ullman A 10-Year Update of "Review and Critique of Empirical Studies of Rape Avoidance" Criminal Justice and Behavior, March 1, 2007; 34(3): 411 - 429. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. R. Brecklin and S. E. Ullman Self-Defense or Assertiveness Training and Women's Responses to Sexual Attacks J Interpers Violence, June 1, 2005; 20(6): 738 - 762. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. E. ULLMAN Review and Critique of Empirical Studies of Rape Avoidance Criminal Justice and Behavior, June 1, 1997; 24(2): 177 - 204. [Abstract] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |