AJPH
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


American Journal of Public Health, Vol. 83, Issue 11 1620-1622, Copyright © 1993 by American Public Health Association

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Myers, R E
Right arrow Articles by Millner, L
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Myers, R E
Right arrow Articles by Millner, L
Screening for colorectal neoplasia: physicians' adherence to complete diagnostic evaluation.

R E Myers, A M Balshem, T A Wolf, E A Ross and L Millner

Population Science Division, Fox Chase Cancer Center, Cheltenham, Pa. 19012.

This prospective study was done in a health maintenance organization colorectal cancer screening program to determine whether 166 persons found to have abnormal fecal occult blood test results typically underwent complete diagnostic evaluation (i.e., either colonoscopy or barium enema x-ray plus flexible sigmoidoscopy). Chart audit data show that 137 (82%) subjects contacted a physician to discuss follow-up. A complete diagnostic evaluation was recommended to only 52 (38%) patients who talked with a physician. Forty-two (81%) patients who were advised to get a complete diagnostic evaluation actually complied. Significant differences in clinical findings were observed for patients who did and did not have a complete diagnostic evaluation.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
CA Cancer J ClinHome page
M. Sarfaty and R. Wender
How to Increase Colorectal Cancer Screening Rates in Practice
CA Cancer J Clin, November 1, 2007; 57(6): 354 - 366.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev.Home page
D. A. Fisher, A. Jeffreys, C. J. Coffman, and K. Fasanella
Barriers to full colon evaluation for a positive fecal occult blood test.
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev., June 1, 2006; 15(6): 1232 - 1235.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Med Care Res RevHome page
K. R. Yabroff, C. N. Klabunde, R. Myers, and M. L. Brown
Physician Recommendations for Follow-Up of Positive Fecal Occult Blood Tests
Med Care Res Rev, February 1, 2005; 62(1): 79 - 110.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
ANN INTERN MEDHome page
M. R. Nadel, J. A. Shapiro, C. N. Klabunde, L. C. Seeff, R. Uhler, R. A. Smith, and D. F. Ransohoff
A National Survey of Primary Care Physicians' Methods for Screening for Fecal Occult Blood
Ann Intern Med, January 18, 2005; 142(2): 86 - 94.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Natl Cancer Inst MonogrHome page
D. Provenzale and R. N. Gray
Colorectal Cancer Screening and Treatment: Review of Outcomes Research
J Natl Cancer Inst Monographs, October 1, 2004; 2004(33): 45 - 55.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev.Home page
K. R. Yabroff, N. Breen, S. W. Vernon, H. I. Meissner, A. N. Freedman, and R. Ballard-Barbash
What Factors Are Associated with Diagnostic Follow-Up after Abnormal Mammograms? Findings from a U.S. National Survey
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev., May 1, 2004; 13(5): 723 - 732.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Med Care Res RevHome page
K. R. Yabroff, K. S. Washington, A. Leader, E. Neilson, and J. Mandelblatt
Is the Promise of Cancer-Screening Programs Being Compromised? Quality of Follow-Up Care after Abnormal Screening Results
Med Care Res Rev, September 1, 2003; 60(3): 294 - 331.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
S. Glick
Double-Contrast Barium Enema for Colorectal Cancer Screening: A Review of the Issues and a Comparison with Other Screening Alternatives
Am. J. Roentgenol., June 1, 2000; 174(6): 1529 - 1537.
[Full Text]


Home page
JNCI J Natl Cancer InstHome page
J. D. Lurie and H. G. Welch
Diagnostic Testing Following Fecal Occult Blood Screening in the Elderly
J Natl Cancer Inst, October 6, 1999; 91(19): 1641 - 1646.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev.Home page
R. E. Myers, T. Hyslop, M. Gerrity, N. Schlackman, N. Hanchak, J. Grana, B. J. Turner, D. Weinberg, and W. W. Hauck
Physician Intention to Recommend Complete Diagnostic Evaluation in Colorectal Cancer Screening
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev., July 1, 1999; 8(7): 587 - 593.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev.Home page
A.-M. Codori, G. M. Petersen, D. L. Miglioretti, E. K. Larkin, M. T. Bushey, C. Young, J. D. Brensinger, K. Johnson, J. A. Bacon, and S. V. Booker
Attitudes toward Colon Cancer Gene Testing: Factors Predicting Test Uptake
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev., April 1, 1999; 8(4): 345 - 351.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1993 by the American Public Health Association