AJPH
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


American Journal of Public Health, Vol. 83, Issue 10 1418-1424, Copyright © 1993 by American Public Health Association

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Pavia, A T
Right arrow Articles by Risk, I
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Pavia, A T
Right arrow Articles by Risk, I
Partner notification for control of HIV: results after 2 years of a statewide program in Utah.

A T Pavia, M Benyo, L Niler and I Risk

Bureau of HIV/AIDS Prevention and Control, Utah Department of Health, Salt Lake City.

OBJECTIVES. We sought to evaluate the utility of partner notification for control of human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection and to identify subgroups in which it may be most effective. METHODS. All persons reported to be HIV-positive during a 2-year period were interviewed. Outcome measures included proportion of index patients cooperating; number of partners named, located, counseled, and tested; number of persons newly testing positive; and costs. RESULTS. Of 308 index patients, 244 (79%) cooperated. They named 890 partners; 499 (70%) of in-state partners were located. Of these, 154 (34%) had previously tested HIV-positive. Of 279 partners tested for the first time, 39 (14%) were HIV-positive. Injecting drug users were significantly more likely to cooperate than persons in other risk groups (93% vs 76%) and named more partners (median 4 vs 1). Women and persons choosing confidential testing were more likely to cooperate and named more partners. The estimated cost of the program was $62,500 per year. CONCLUSIONS. Partner notification identified a group with a high seroprevalence of HIV. It was not successful among populations that may be difficult to reach with other interventions.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
ANN INTERN MEDHome page
D. H. Osmond, A. B. Bindman, K. Vranizan, J. S. Lehman, F. M. Hecht, D. Keane, A. Reingold, and for the Multistate Evaluation of Surveillance for
Name-Based Surveillance and Public Health Interventions for Persons with HIV Infection
Ann Intern Med, November 16, 1999; 131(10): 775 - 779.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1993 by the American Public Health Association